Instant Search: Just type some words and look for the results bellow
Loading knowledgebase suggestions...
» Category: Paper evaluation
(Go back)
» Articles in this category:
|
|
|
|
|
As an author, you are kindly asked to check, on a point-by-point basis, if:
1. The paper is well organized;
2. The paper is readable;
3. English grammar and spelling are proper;
4. Mathematical ... |
|
|
You have to access the Submission Status interface at:
https://www.aece.ro/openconf/author/status.php
If you forgot your password, you may recover it by using the Submission ID and the E-mail ad... |
|
|
After receiving our E-mail with information about your paper evaluation, authors are kindly invited to revise the paper according to reviewers' comments.
If there are things to comment about or you... |
|
|
If the author fail to follow the administrative rules for submitting a paper (regarding the copyright form, authors and their real affiliations, contact E-mails, refuse to correct the paper format err... |
|
|
Even you may not always find negative comments from the reviewers, each reviewer evaluated your paper with a mark and sent also comments to the Journal Editor. The comments to the Editor are confident... |
|
|
Usually, the fast-track publication if offered to authors paying an evaluation fee. As it is difficult to manage both types of papers, we decided not to offer this option, at least for the moment. It ... |
|
|
If you propose a paper including one of the followings, but not limited to:
- an improvement to a well-known protocol, or a new version of an existing protocol;
- a new topology or an improvement ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page was loaded in your web browser in seconds.
Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by:
|
|
|
Powered by Help Desk Software HESK™ Brought to you by Help Desk Software SysAid |