Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.700
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.700
SCOPUS CiteScore: 1.8
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Feb 2025
Next issue: May 2025
Avg review time: 58 days
Avg accept to publ: 60 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

3,441,873 unique visits
1,323,069 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
bingbot
PetalBot
Googlebot
SemrushBot


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 25 (2025)
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2025
 
 
 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  








LATEST NEWS

2024-Jun-20
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2023. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.700 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.600.

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

Read More »


  1/2025 - 4

Automated Segmentation of Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Attention U-net with Patch Mechanism

CINAR, N. See more information about CINAR, N. on SCOPUS See more information about CINAR, N. on IEEExplore See more information about CINAR, N. on Web of Science, UCAN, M., KAYA, B. See more information about  KAYA, B. on SCOPUS See more information about  KAYA, B. on SCOPUS See more information about KAYA, B. on Web of Science, KAYA, M. See more information about KAYA, M. on SCOPUS See more information about KAYA, M. on SCOPUS See more information about KAYA, M. on Web of Science
 
Extra paper information in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar View the paper record and similar papers in Microsoft Bing View the paper record and similar papers in Semantic Scholar the AI-powered research tool
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (2,228 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 271 | Views: 365

Author keywords
attention U-Net, brain stroke segmentation, deep learning, ischemic stroke, U-Net

References keywords
segmentation(32), stroke(17), brain(11), network(10), ischemic(10), lesion(9), attention(9), neural(7), multi(7), images(7)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2025-02-28
Volume 25, Issue 1, Year 2025, On page(s): 29 - 42
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2025.01004
SCOPUS ID: 105001301554

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
This paper addresses ischemic stroke detection using deep learning techniques to interpret medical images like MRI and CT scans, with a focus on segmentation. Ischemic stroke occurs when a blockage in brain arteries disrupts blood flow, impairing brain functions. The study aims to develop a model for automatic segmentation of ischemic stroke areas, facilitating efficient diagnosis in medical settings. An enhanced Attention U-Net model with a patch-based approach using MRI data is proposed for this purpose. The model was validated on the ISLES22 public ischemic stroke dataset. The segmentation process consisted of three stages. First, the standard Attention U-Net model achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 88.9%. In the second stage, the MRI images were divided into 32x32 patches and reanalyzed, increasing the DSC to 93%. In the final stage, different attention mechanism methods were added to the U-Net architecture and the effect of attention mechanism on segmentation success was observed. As a result of the experiments, the U-Net architecture using spatial attention achieved 94.86%, the U-Net architecture using SE attention achieved 95.40%, and the U-Net architecture using CBAM attention achieved 96.47% DCS success. The study concludes that the enhanced model outperforms existing methods, demonstrating that the proposed approach is effective for segmenting ischemic strokes and yielding significant results compared to similar studies in the literature.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] S. Yahiya, A. Yousif, M. Bakri, Classification of Ischemic Stroke using Machine Learning Algorithms, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 149 (2016) 26-31.
[CrossRef]


[2] N. Tomita, S. Jiang, M. E. Maeder, S. Hassanpour, Automatic post-stroke lesion segmentation on MR images using 3D residual convolutional neural network, NeuroImage Clin. 27 (2020) 102276.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 37] [SCOPUS Times Cited 54]


[3] W. Yu, Z. Huang, J. Zhang, H. Shan, SAN-Net: Learning generalization to unseen sites for stroke lesion segmentation with self-adaptive normalization, Comput. Biol. Med. 156 (2023) 106717.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14] [SCOPUS Times Cited 24]


[4] A. Clerigues, S. Valverde, J. Bernal, J. Freixenet, A. Oliver, X. Llado, Acute ischemic stroke lesion core segmentation in CT perfusion images using fully convolutional neural networks, Comput. Biol. Med. 115 (2019) 103487.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 77] [SCOPUS Times Cited 102]


[5] S. Qamar, H. Jin, R. Zheng, P. Ahmad, 3D Hyper-Dense Connected Convolutional Neural Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation, in: Proc. - 2018 14th Int. Conf. Semant. Knowl. Grids, SKG 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018: pp. 123-130.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 16] [SCOPUS Times Cited 19]


[6] X. Zhang, C. Liu, N. Ou, X. Zeng, Z. Zhuo, Y. Duan, X. Xiong, Y. Yu, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Ye, CarveMix: A simple data augmentation method for brain lesion segmentation, Neuroimage. 271 (2023).
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 11] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16]


[7] M. Platscher, J. Zopes, C. Federau, Image translation for medical image generation: Ischemic stroke lesion segmentation, Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 72 (2022) 103283.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23] [SCOPUS Times Cited 30]


[8] Y. Xue, F. G. Farhat, O. Boukrina, A. M. Barrett, J. R. Binder, U. W. Roshan, W. W. Graves, A multi-path 2.5 dimensional convolutional neural network system for segmenting stroke lesions in brain MRI images, NeuroImage Clin. 25 (2020) 102118.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 45] [SCOPUS Times Cited 66]


[9] Y. C. Wei, W. Y. Huang, C. Y. Jian, C. C. H. Hsu, C. C. Hsu, C. P. Lin, C. T. Cheng, Y. L. Chen, H. Y. Wei, K. F. Chen, Semantic segmentation guided detector for segmentation, classification, and lesion mapping of acute ischemic stroke in MRI images, NeuroImage Clin. 35 (2022) 103044.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 7] [SCOPUS Times Cited 12]


[10] L. Giancardo, A. Niktabe, L. Ocasio, R. Abdelkhaleq, S. Salazar-Marioni, S.A. Sheth, Segmentation of acute stroke infarct core using image-level labels on CT-angiography, NeuroImage Clin. 37 (2023) 103362.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 6] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[11] R. Zoetmulder, L. Baak, N. Khalili, H.A. Marquering, N. Wagenaar, M. Benders, N. E. van der Aa, I. Isgum, Brain segmentation in patients with perinatal arterial ischemic stroke, NeuroImage Clin. 38 (2023).
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 7] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6]


[12] A.R. Lee, I. Woo, D.W. Kang, S.C. Jung, H. Lee, N. Kim, Fully automated segmentation on brain ischemic and white matter hyperintensities lesions using semantic segmentation networks with squeeze-and-excitation blocks in MRI, Informatics Med. Unlocked. 21 (2020) 100440.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 9]


[13] J. Walsh, A. Othmani, M. Jain, S. Dev, Using U-Net network for efficient brain tumor segmentation in MRI images, Healthc. Anal. 2 (2022) 100098.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 81]


[14] N. Cinar, A. Ozcan, M. Kaya, A hybrid DenseNet121-U-Net model for brain tumor segmentation from MR Images, Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 76 (2022) 103647.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 47] [SCOPUS Times Cited 69]


[15] C. Han, J. Lin, J. Mai, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, B. Zhao, X. Chen, X. Pan, Z. Shi, Z. Xu, S. Yao, L. Yan, H. Lin, X. Huang, C. Liang, G. Han, Z. Liu, Multi-layer pseudo-supervision for histopathology tissue semantic segmentation using patch-level classification labels, Med. Image Anal. 80 (2022) 102487.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 56] [SCOPUS Times Cited 71]


[16] O. Oktay, J. Schlemper, L. Le Folgoc, M. Lee, M. Heinrich, K. Misawa, K. Mori, S. McDonagh, N.Y. Hammerla, B. Kainz, B. Glocker, D. Rueckert, Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas, (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03999

[17] M. R. Hernandez Petzsche, E. de la Rosa, U. Hanning, R. Wiest, W. Valenzuela, M. Reyes, M. Meyer, S. L. Liew, F. Kofler, I. Ezhov, D. Robben, A. Hutton, T. Friedrich, T. Zarth, J. Burkle, T. A. Baran, B. Menze, G. Broocks, L. Meyer, C. Zimmer, T. Boeckh-Behrens, M. Berndt, B. Ikenberg, B. Wiestler, J. S. Kirschke, ISLES 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset, Sci. Data. 9 (2022) 1-9.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 54] [SCOPUS Times Cited 74]


[18] B. Lee, N. Yamanakkanavar, J.Y. Choi, Automatic segmentation of brain MRI using a novel patch-wise U-net deep architecture, PLoS One. 15 (2020) 1-20.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 59] [SCOPUS Times Cited 78]


[19] L. Borne, D. Riviere, M. Mancip, J. F. Mangin, Automatic labeling of cortical sulci using patch- or CNN-based segmentation techniques combined with bottom-up geometric constraints, Med. Image Anal. 62 (2020).
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 44] [SCOPUS Times Cited 47]


[20] F. Ullah, A. Salam, M. Abrar, F. Amin, Brain Tumor Segmentation Using a Patch-Based Convolutional Neural Network: A Big Data Analysis Approach, Mathematics. 11 (2023) 1-18.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 12] [SCOPUS Times Cited 21]


[21] D. Franco-Barranco, A. Munoz-Barrutia, I. Arganda-Carreras, Stable Deep Neural Network Architectures for Mitochondria Segmentation on Electron Microscopy Volumes, Neuroinformatics. 20 (2022) 437-450.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 17]


[22] R. Yousef, S. Khan, G. Gupta, T. Siddiqui, B. M. Albahlal, S. A. Alajlan, M. A. Haq, U-Net-Based Models towards Optimal MR Brain Image Segmentation, Diagnostics. 13 (2023).
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 47] [SCOPUS Times Cited 61]


[23] K. Trebing, T. Stanczyk, S. Mehrkanoon, Smart-U-Net: Precipitation nowcasting using a small Attention U-Netarchitecture, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 145 (2021) 178-186.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 249] [SCOPUS Times Cited 303]


[24] D. Franco-Barranco, A. Munoz-Barrutia, I. Arganda-Carreras, Stable Deep Neural Network Architectures for Mitochondria Segmentation on Electron Microscopy Volumes, Neuroinformatics. 20 (2022) 437-450.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 17]


[25] J. Wang, X. Zhang, P. Lv, H. Wang, Y. Cheng, Automatic Liver Segmentation Using EfficientNet and Attention-Based Residual U-Net in CT, J. Digit. Imaging. 35 (2022) 1479-1493.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18]


[26] X. Tong, J. Wei, B. Sun, S. Su, Z. Zuo, P. Wu, Ascu-net: Attention gate, spatial and channel attention u-net for skin lesion segmentation, Diagnostics. 11 (2021).
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 79] [SCOPUS Times Cited 114]


[27] Y. Yu, S. Chen, H. Wei, Modified U-Net with attention gate and dense skip connection for flow field information prediction with porous media, Flow Meas. Instrum. 89 (2023) 102300.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16]


[28] M. H. Guo, T. X. Xu, J. J. Liu, Z. N. Liu, P. T. Jiang, T. J. Mu, S. H. Zhang, R. R. Martin, M. M. Cheng, S. M. Hu, Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey, Comput. Vis. Media. 8 (2022) 331-368.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1234] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1594]


[29] L. Rundo et al., "USE-Net: Incorporating Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks into U-Net for prostate zonal segmentation of multi-institutional MRI datasets", Neurocomputing, vol. 365, pp. 31-43, Nov. 2019.

[30] S. Ucan, M. Ucan, and M. Kaya, "Deep learning based approach with EfficientNet and SE block attention mechanism for multiclass Alzheimer's disease detection", in 2023 4th International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI), Bahrain, 2023, pp. 285-289.

[31] Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Gu, H. Yu, and D. Xu, "U-net model based on cbam attention mechanism for Coronary Angiography segmentation", J. Mech. Med. Biol., vol. 24, no. 09, Nov. 2024.

[32] H. A. Shah and J.-M. Kang, "An optimized multi-organ cancer cells segmentation for histopathological images based on CBAM-residual U-net", IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 111608-111621, 2023.

[33] D. Alis, M. Yergin, C. Alis, C. Topel, O. Asmakutlu, O. Bagcilar, Y.D. Senli, A. Ustundag, V. Salt, S.N. Dogan, M. Velioglu, H.H. Selcuk, B. Kara, I. Oksuz, O. Kizilkilic, E. Karaarslan, Inter-vendor performance of deep learning in segmenting acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging: a multicenter study, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 1-10.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 10] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14]


[34] S. Li, J. Zheng, D. Li, Precise segmentation of non-enhanced computed tomography in patients with ischemic stroke based on multi-scale U-Net deep network model, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 208 (2021) 106278.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18]


[35] G. B. Praveen, A. Agrawal, P. Sundaram, S. Sardesai, Ischemic stroke lesion segmentation using stacked sparse autoencoder, Comput. Biol. Med. 99 (2018) 38-52.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 49] [SCOPUS Times Cited 63]


[36] K. K. Wong, J. S. Cummock, G. Li, R. Ghosh, P. Xu, J.J. Volpi, S.T.C. Wong, Automatic Segmentation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Prognostic Significance of Topological Stroke Volumes on Stroke Outcome, Stroke. 53 (2022) 2896-2905.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 23]


[37] J. Wu, X. Tang, Brain segmentation based on multi-atlas and diffeomorphism guided 3D fully convolutional network ensembles, Pattern Recognit. 115 (2021) 107904.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 36] [SCOPUS Times Cited 38]


[38] Z. Wu, X. Zhang, F. Li, S. Wang, L. Huang, and J. Li, "W-Net: A boundary-enhanced segmentation network for stroke lesions", Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 230, no. 120637, p. 120637, Nov. 2023.



References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 2,322 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 3,082 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 60 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 79 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2025-04-22 08:38 in 213 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2025
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: