3/2019 - 8 |
A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Security Risk Assessment in SCADA NetworksMARKOVIC-PETROVIC, J. D. , STOJANOVIC, M. D. , BOSTJANCIC RAKAS, S. V. |
Extra paper information in |
Click to see author's profile in SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science |
Download PDF (280 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 983 | Views: 2,912 |
Author keywords
decision making, fuzzy logic, information security, risk analysis, SCADA systems
References keywords
security(15), systems(9), scada(9), risk(8), cyber(8), assessment(7), control(5), industrial(4), fuzzy(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-08-31
Volume 19, Issue 3, Year 2019, On page(s): 69 - 74
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.03008
Web of Science Accession Number: 000486574100008
SCOPUS ID: 85072203058
Abstract
In this paper we propose a new method for security risk assessment in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) networks. The method consists of the three phases, namely the objective phase, the subjective phase and the final assessment phase. The objective phase deals with the analysis of SCADA historical data. The subjective phase takes into account the experience of relevant experts. The final assessment phase takes into account outputs from both the objective and subjective phases. Fuzzy logic has been applied in all three phases, while analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been used in subjective phase, due to its suitability to evaluate the experts' competency. The method is evaluated on a case study regarding the real run-off-river hydropower plant. Evaluation results have clearly indicated benefits of the proposed method in comparison with the purely objective approach, in terms of more precise risk assessment and higher return on security investment. |
References | | | Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper |
[1] M. Stojanovic, S. Bostjancic Rakas, J. Markovic-Petrovic, "Cloud-based SCADA systems: Cyber security considerations and future challenges," invited paper, in Proc. 4th Virtual Int. Conf. Science, Technology and Management in Energy, pp. 253-260, October 2018. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document
[2] B. Zhu, A. Joseph, S. Sastry, "A taxonomy of cyber attacks on SCADA systems," in Proc. 2011 International Conference on the Internet of Things and the 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2011, pp. 380-388. [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 373] [3] A. Nicholson, S. Webber, S. Dyer, T. Patel, H. Janicke, "SCADA security in the light of cyber-warfare," Computers & Security, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 418-436, Jun. 2012. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 185] [SCOPUS Times Cited 271] [4] D. Ding, Q.-L. Han, Y. Xiang, X. Ge, X.-M. Zhang, "A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems," Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 1674-1683, Jan. 2018. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 650] [SCOPUS Times Cited 805] [5] C. Queiroz, A. Mahmood, J. Hu, Z. Tari, X. Yu, "Building a SCADA security testbed," in Proc. 2009 Third International Conference on Network and System Security, IEEE, 2009, pp. 357-364. [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 79] [6] J. Markovic-Petrovic, M. Stojanovic, "Analysis of SCADA system vulnerabilities to DDoS attacks," in Proc. 2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013, vol. 02, pp. 591-594. [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 29] [7] S. Asri, B. Pranggono, "Impact of distributed denial-of-service attack on advanced metering infrastructure," Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 2211-2223, Aug. 2015. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 43] [SCOPUS Times Cited 61] [8] J. Gao et al., "SCADA communication and security issues," Security and Communication Networks, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 175-194, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 53] [SCOPUS Times Cited 76] [9] R. S. Ross, "Guide for conducting risk assessments," National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-30 Rev. 1, Sep. 2012. [10] J. D. Markovic-Petrovic, M. D. Stojanovic, "An improved risk assessment method for SCADA information security," Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 69-72, Sep. 2014. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 12] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16] [11] Y. Cherdantseva et al., "A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems," Computers & Security, vol. 56, pp.1-27, Feb. 2016. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 314] [SCOPUS Times Cited 473] [12] P. A. S. Ralston, J. H. Graham, J. L. Hieb, "Cyber security risk assessment for SCADA and DCS networks," ISA Transactions, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 583-594, Oct. 2007. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 163] [SCOPUS Times Cited 233] [13] J. Yan, M. Govindarasu, C. Liu, U. Vaidya, "A PMU-based risk assessment framework for power control systems," in Proc. 2013 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2013, pp. 1-5. [CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14] [14] M. Gul, A. F. Guneri, "A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 40, pp. 89-100, Mar. 2016. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 124] [SCOPUS Times Cited 147] [15] Q. Zhang, C. Zhou, Y. Tian, N. Xiong, Y. Qin, B. Hu, "A fuzzy probability Bayesian network approach for dynamic cybersecurity risk assessment in industrial control systems," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2497-2506, Jun. 2018. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 116] [SCOPUS Times Cited 142] [16] Y. Duan, Y. Cai, Z. Wang, X. Deng, "A novel network security risk assessment approach by combining subjective and objective weights under uncertainty," Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 428, Mar. 2018. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 15] [SCOPUS Times Cited 17] [17] T. L. Saaty, "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83-98, Jan. 2008. [CrossRef] [18] W. Sonnenreich, J. Albanese, B. Stout, "Return on security investment (ROSI) a practical quantitative model," in Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Security in Information Systems - Volume 1, WOSIS, 2005, pp. 239-252. [CrossRef] [19] K. Scarfone, P. Mell, "Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) | NIST," Special Publication (NIST SP) - 800-94, Feb. 2007. [20] H. Zhang, D. Liu, Fuzzy Modeling and Fuzzy Control, Birkhäuser Basel, pp. 139-145, 2006. [CrossRef] [21] B. Galloway, G. Hancke, "Introduction to industrial control networks," IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 860-880, 2013. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 296] [SCOPUS Times Cited 401] [22] R. Mitchell, I.-R. Chen, "A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber physical systems," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 55:1-55:29, Mar. 2014. [CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 438] [SCOPUS Times Cited 539] Web of Science® Citations for all references: 2,409 TCR SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 3,676 TCR Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 105 ACR SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 160 ACR TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more Citations for references updated on 2024-12-21 16:19 in 130 seconds. Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics. Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site. |
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.