Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.700
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.700
SCOPUS CiteScore: 1.8
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Nov 2024
Next issue: Feb 2025
Avg review time: 56 days
Avg accept to publ: 60 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

3,030,160 unique visits
1,178,322 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
DotBot
Googlebot


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

A Proposed Signal Reconstruction Algorithm over Bandlimited Channels for Wireless Communications, ASHOUR, A., KHALAF, A., HUSSEIN, A., HAMED, H., RAMADAN, A.
Issue 1/2023

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2024-Jun-20
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2023. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.700 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.600.

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

Read More »


    
 

  4/2010 - 22

 HIGH-IMPACT PAPER 

Dynamic shielding of the magnetic fields

BALTAG, O. See more information about BALTAG, O. on SCOPUS See more information about BALTAG, O. on IEEExplore See more information about BALTAG, O. on Web of Science, COSTANDACHE, D. See more information about  COSTANDACHE, D. on SCOPUS See more information about  COSTANDACHE, D. on SCOPUS See more information about COSTANDACHE, D. on Web of Science, RAU, M. See more information about  RAU, M. on SCOPUS See more information about  RAU, M. on SCOPUS See more information about RAU, M. on Web of Science, IFTEMIE, A. See more information about  IFTEMIE, A. on SCOPUS See more information about  IFTEMIE, A. on SCOPUS See more information about IFTEMIE, A. on Web of Science, RAU, I. See more information about RAU, I. on SCOPUS See more information about RAU, I. on SCOPUS See more information about RAU, I. on Web of Science
 
Extra paper information in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar View the paper record and similar papers in Microsoft Bing View the paper record and similar papers in Semantic Scholar the AI-powered research tool
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (9,883 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 2,331 | Views: 6,871

Author keywords
active shielding, biomagnetics, dynamic shielding, magnetic field, magnetic shielding

References keywords
magnetic(24), shielding(12), active(12), field(11), fields(7), finland(6), biomagnetic(6), technology(5), shielded(5), nowak(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2010-11-30
Volume 10, Issue 4, Year 2010, On page(s): 135 - 142
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2010.04022
Web of Science Accession Number: 000284782700022
SCOPUS ID: 78649717908

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
The paper presents a comparative study of the methods used to control and compensate the direct and alternative magnetic fields. Two frequently used methods in the electromagnetic compatibility of the complex biomagnetism installations were analyzed. The two methods refer to the use of inductive magnetic field sensors (only for alternative fields) and of fluxgate magnetometers as active transducers which measures both the direct and alternative components of the magnetic field. The applications of the dynamic control of the magnetic field are: control of the magnetic field of the military ships, control of parasite magnetic field produced by power transformers and the electrical networks, protection of the mass spectrometers, electronic microscopes, SQUID and optical pumping magnetometers for applications in biomagnetism.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] Y. C. Okada, B. Shan, Jin-Chu Huang, "Ferromagnetic high-permeability alloy alone can provide sufficient low-frequency and eddy-current shielding for biomagnetic measurements", IEEE Trans.on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41(7), pp. 688-697, 1994.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 22] [SCOPUS Times Cited 24]


[2] Cohen D., Schlapfer U., Ahlfors S., M. Hamalainen and E. Halgren, "New six layer magnetically shielded room for MEG", Biomag 2002: Proc.of the 13th Int. Conf.on Biomagnetism 2002, Jena, Germany, Berlin: VDE Verlag GmbH, Nowak, H., Haueisen, J., Giesler, F., Huonker, R. (eds.), 2002.

[3] G. Stroink, Blackford B., Brown B., Horacek M., "Aluminum shielded room for biomagnetic measurements", Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52(3), pp.463-468, 1981.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 22] [SCOPUS Times Cited 26]


[4] F. Resmer, H. Nowak, F. Giessler, J. Haueisen, "Development of an active magnetic screen to allow a biomagnetometer to be used in an unshielded environment", Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, pp. 1365-1371, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18]


[5] John J. Holmes, "Reduction of a Ship's Magnetic Field Signatures", Synthesis Lectures on Computational Electromagnetics, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-68, 2008

[6] O. Baltag, O. Robu, D. Costandache, C. Ignat, Magnetometrie, Ed. Performantica, Iasi, 2003

[7] K. Kato, K. Yamazaki, T. Sato, A. Haga, et al, "Active magnetic compensation composed of shielding panels", Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 68, pp. 1-4, 2004

[8] H. J. M. ter Brake, R. Huonker, H. Rogalla, "New results in active noise compensation for magnetically shielded rooms", Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, pp. 1370-1375, 1993.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 41]


[9] H. J. M. ter Brake, H. J. Wieringa, H. Rogalla, "Improvement of the performance of a mu-metal magnetically shielded room by means of active compensation", Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 596-601, 1991.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 34]


[10] D. Platzek, H. Nowak, F. Giessler, J. Rother, M. Eiselt, "Active shielding to reduce low frequency disturbances in direct current near biomagnetic measurements", Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 70, pp. 2465-2470, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 49] [SCOPUS Times Cited 65]


[11] K. Kato, K. Yamazaki, H. Matsuba, C. Sumi, S. Sato, "Active magnetic shield for biomagnetic measurements", Biomag 2000: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism 2000, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, Ed. J. Nenonen, R. Ilmoniemi, T. Katila (Vantaa, Finland: Dark) pp. 965-967, 2001

[12] C. Holmlund, M. Keipi, T. Meinander, A. Penttinen, and H. Seppa, "Novel concepts in magnetic shielding", Biomag 2000: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism 2000, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, Ed. J. Nenonen, R. Ilmoniemi, T. Katila, (Vantaa, Finland:Dark) pp. 968-969, 2001

[13] D. Costandache, A. Banarescu, O. Baltag, I. Rau, M. Rau, S. Ojica, "Dynamic shielding in biomagnetism", IFMBE Proceedings, Vol. 26, pp. 121-124, 2009.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 6] [SCOPUS Times Cited 8]


[14] C. Gu, S. Zou, Z. Han, T. M. Qu, "Passive magnetic field cancellation device by multiple high-Tc superconducting coils", Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 045101-045101-5, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 9] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10]


[15] T. Brys, S. Czekaj, M. Daum, P. Fierlinger, D. George, R. Henneck, Z. Hochman, M. Kasprzak, K. Kohlik, K.Kirch, M. Kuzniak, G. Kuehne, A. Pichlmaier, A. Siodmok, A. Szelc, and L. Tanner, "Magnetic Field Stabilization for Magnetically Shielded Volumes by External Field Coils", J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 173-178, 2005
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 8]


[16] S. Kuriki, A. Hayashi, Y. Hirata, "Hybrid technique for reduction of environmental magnetic field noise", Biomag 2000: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism 2000, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, Ed. J. Nenonen, R. Ilmoniemi, T. Katila (Vantaa, Finland: Dark) pp. 957-960, 2001

[17] K. Yamazaki, K. Kato, K. Kobayashi et al, "MCG Measurement in the environment of active magnetic shield", Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 40, pp. 1-4, 2004 [PubMed]

[18] B. Hilgenfeld, E. Strahmel, H. Nowak, J. Haueisen, "Active magnetic shielding for biomagnetic measurement using spatial gradient fields", Physiol. Meas., vol. 24, pp. 661-669, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 21]


[19] H. Nowak, J. Haueisen, M. Ziolkowski, F. Resmer, J. Schuler, F. Giessler, "Active shielding in measurements of DC near biomagnetic fields", Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2001, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE, vol. 4, pp. 3277-3280, 2001.
[CrossRef]


[20] M. H. Acuna, J. L. Scheifele, P. Stella, C. Kloss, B. Smith, G. Heinshohn, K. Sharmit, "Magnetic field cancellation techniques for Mars global surveyor solar array", Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Washington DC, pp. 325-328, 1996.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 4] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[21] O. Baltag, "Dynamic control and annulement of electromagnetic pollution", Proceedings of the 11th Int. Symposion of EMC, Zurich, pp. 75L6, l995

[22] E. Calvo, M. Cerrada, C. Fernández-Bedoya, I. Gil-Botella, C. Palomares, I. Rodríguez, F. Toral, A. Verdugo, "Characterization of large-area photomultipliers under low magnetic fields: Design and performance of the magnetic shielding for the Double Chooz neutrino experiment", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics, Research Section A, Vol. 621, No. 1-3, pp. 222-230, 2010.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [Web of Science Times Cited 36] [SCOPUS Times Cited 39]


[23] C. J. Dedman, R. G. Dall, L. J. Byron, A. G. Truscott, "Active cancellation of stray magnetic fields in a Bose-Einstein condensation experiment", Rev. Sci. Instrum. Vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 024703, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 40] [SCOPUS Times Cited 38]


[24] H. E. Peters, H. B. Owings and P. A. Koppang, "Atomic hydrogen masers with self auto-tune system and magnetic field cancellation servo", Proceedings of the 20th Annual Time and Time Interval Systems and Applications Meeting, Vienna, 1988

[25] K. H. Downing, W. Chiu, "Effect of stray magnetic field on image resolution in transmission electron microscopy", Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 5, Issues 1-3, pp. 351-356, 1980

[26] M. Pluska, L. Oskwarek, R. Rak, A. Czerwinski, "Quantitative Measurement of Electromagnetic Distortions in Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)" Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, 2007. IMTC 2007. IEEE, Warsaw, 2007.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[27] T. Schurig, L. Trahms "SQUID Activities at PTB: Status 2008", IEEE/CSC & ESAS European Superconductivity News Forum, no. 8, 2009

[28] A. Ishiyama, H. Hirooka, "Magnetic shielding for MRI superconducting magnets", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 1692 - 1695, 1991
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23] [SCOPUS Times Cited 29]


[29] S. Kakugawa, N. Hino, A. Komura, M. Kitamura, H. Takeshima, T. Yatsuo, H. Tazaki, "Shielding stray magnetic fields of open high field MRI magnets", IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 14, No.2, pp. 1639 - 1642, 2004.
[CrossRef]


[30] S. D. Golladay, "Active electronic compensation of ambient magnetic fields for electron optical columns", Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 2070 - 2073, 1988.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 5]


[31] A. S. Farag, M. M. Dawoud, I. O. Habiballah, "Implementation of shielding principles for magnetic field management of power cables", Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 193-209, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 12] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20]


[32] J. Lentz, A. S. Edelstein, "Magnetic sensors and their applications", IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 631-649, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 913] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1084]


[33] V. Korepanov, R. Berkman, L. Rakhlin, Y. Klymovich, A. Prystal, A. Marussenkov, M. Afanasenko, "Advanced field magnetometers comparative study", Measurement, vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 137-146, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 33] [SCOPUS Times Cited 42]


[34] Y. Okazaki, S. Yanase, N. Sugimoto, "Active magnetic shielding with magneto-impedance sensor", Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., vol. 13, pp. 437-4340, 2001

[35] V. David, E. Cretu, Masurari in biomedicina si ecologie, Ed. Gh. Asachi, Iasi, 1999

[36] C. Coillot, J. Moutoussamy, R. Lebourgeois, S. Ruocco, G. Chanteur, "Principle and performance of a dual-band search coil magnetometer: A new instrument to investigate fluctuating magnetic fields in space", IEEE Sensor Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 255-260, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 40] [SCOPUS Times Cited 45]


[37] Gopel W., Hesse J., Zemel J.N., Sensors, Vol.5, Magnetic sensors, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, Germany, 1989.

References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 1,248 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 1,562 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 34 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 42 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-12-09 09:31 in 154 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy