|1/2012 - 11|
Formal Model for Data Dependency Analysis between Controls and Actions of a Graphical User InterfaceSKVORC, D. , ZUZAK, I. , SRBLJIC, S.
|Click to see author's profile in SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science|
|Download PDF (580 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 1,021 | Views: 4,927|
computer aided software engineering, formal specifications, graphical user interfaces, programming environments, user centered design
testing(9), software(8), user(7), memon(4), graphical(4), finite(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.
About this article
Date of Publication: 2012-02-28
Volume 12, Issue 1, Year 2012, On page(s): 63 - 70
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2012.01011
Web of Science Accession Number: 000301075000011
SCOPUS ID: 84860707000
End-user development is an emerging computer science discipline that provides programming paradigms, techniques, and tools suitable for users not trained in software engineering. One of the techniques that allow ordinary computer users to develop their own applications without the need to learn a classic programming language is a GUI-level programming based on programming-by-demonstration. To build wizard-based tools that assist users in application development and to verify the correctness of user programs, a computer-supported method for GUI-level data dependency analysis is necessary. Therefore, formal model for GUI representation is needed. In this paper, we present a finite state machine for modeling the data dependencies between GUI controls and GUI actions. Furthermore, we present an algorithm for automatic construction of finite state machine for arbitrary GUI application. We show that proposed state aggregation scheme successfully manages state explosion in state machine construction algorithm, which makes the model applicable for applications with complex GUIs.
|References|||||Cited By «-- Click to see who has cited this paper|
| S. Staiger, "Static analysis of programs with graphical user interface", Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR07), Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007, pp. 252-264. |
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 22]
 M. Bolin, M. Webber, P. Rha, T. Wilson, R. C. Miller, "Automation and customization of rendered web pages", Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Seattle, WA, USA, 2005, pp. 163-172.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 147]
 J. Wong, J. Hong, "Making mashups with marmite: towards end-user programming for the web", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI06), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006, pp. 1541-1546.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 239]
 S. Srbljic, D. Skvorc, D. Skrobo, "Widget-oriented consumer programming", Automatika: Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications, Vol. 50, No. 3-4, December 2009, pp. 252-264. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document
 A. Holmes, M. Kellogg, "Automating functional tests using Selenium", Proceedings of the Conference on AGILE 2006, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2006, pp. 270-275. [Online].
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 27] [SCOPUS Times Cited 46]
 T. Yeh, T. H. Chang, R. C. Miller, "Sikuli: using GUI screenshots for search and automation", Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2009, pp. 183-192.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 85]
 A. M. Memon, "Advances in GUI testing", Advances in Computers, No. 58, Academic Press, August 2003, pp. 149-202.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 4] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4]
 J. C. Silva, J. Saraiva, J. C. Campos, "A generic library for GUI reasoning and testing", Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2009, pp. 121-128.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16]
 A. Gill, Introduction to the theory of finite state machines, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
 J. E. Hopcroft, "An nlogn algorithm for minimizing the states in a finite automaton", The Theory of Machines and Computations, Academic Press, New York, 1971. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document
 V. Chinnapongse, I. Lee, O. Sokolsky, S. Wang, P. L. Jones, "Model-based testing of GUI-driven applications", Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 10.2 International Workshop on Software Technologies for Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 203-214.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16]
 F. Belli, "Finite state testing and analysis of graphical user interfaces", Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Hong Kong, China, November 2001, pp. 34-43.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 85]
 V. Santiago, N. L. Vijaykumar, D. Guimaraes, A. S. Amaral, E. Ferreira, "An environment for automated test case generation from statechart-based and finite state machine-based behavioral models", IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, 2008, pp. 63 72.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 30]
 M. B. Dwyer, V. Carr, L. Hines, "Model checking graphical user interfaces using abstractions", ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 22, No. 6, New York, NY, USA, November 1997, pp. 244-261.
 A. M. Memon, "An event-flow model of GUI-based applications for testing", Software Testing, Verification & Reliability, Vol. 17, No. 3, John Wiley and Sons, September 2007, pp. 137-157.
 A. M. Memon, M. E. Pollack, M. Lou Soffa, "Plan generation for GUI testing", Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling, April 2000, pp. 226-235. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document
 A. M. Memon, I. Banerjee, A. Nagarajan, "GUI ripping: reverse engineering of graphical user interfaces for testing", 10th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, 2003, pp. 260-269.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 142] [SCOPUS Times Cited 117]
Web of Science® Citations for all references: 258 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 722 TCR
Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 14 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 40 ACR
TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference
We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more
Citations for references updated on 2021-05-08 09:32 in 77 seconds.
Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.
Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.