Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.825
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.752
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.5
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: May 2022
Next issue: Aug 2022
Avg review time: 79 days
Avg accept to publ: 48 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

1,920,436 unique visits
742,471 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



No robots online now


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
 Volume 20 (2020)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2020
 
 
 Volume 19 (2019)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2019
 
 
 Volume 18 (2018)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2018
 
 
  View all issues  








LATEST NEWS

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

2021-Jun-06
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2020, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2017-2020 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2020 is 2.5, better than all our previous results.

2021-Apr-15
Release of the v3 version of AECE Journal website. We moved to a new server and implemented the latest cryptographic protocols to assure better compatibility with the most recent browsers. Our website accepts now only TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 secure connections.

Read More »


    
 

  2/2013 - 10

 HIGHLY CITED PAPER 

Comparing the Robustness of Evolutionary Algorithms on the Basis of Benchmark Functions

DENIZ ULKER, E. See more information about DENIZ ULKER, E. on SCOPUS See more information about DENIZ ULKER, E. on IEEExplore See more information about DENIZ ULKER, E. on Web of Science, HAYDAR, A. See more information about HAYDAR, A. on SCOPUS See more information about HAYDAR, A. on SCOPUS See more information about HAYDAR, A. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (702 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 620 | Views: 3,158

Author keywords
computational intelligence, evolutionary computation, heuristic algorithms

References keywords
optimization(14), evolutionary(11), computation(9), algorithm(9), search(7), algorithms(7), harmony(6), applied(6), swarm(5), geem(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2013-05-31
Volume 13, Issue 2, Year 2013, On page(s): 59 - 64
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2013.02010
Web of Science Accession Number: 000322179400010
SCOPUS ID: 84878946831

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
In real-world optimization problems, even though the solution quality is of great importance, the robustness of the solution is also an important aspect. This paper investigates how the optimization algorithms are sensitive to the variations of control parameters and to the random initialization of the solution set for fixed control parameters. The comparison is performed of three well-known evolutionary algorithms which are Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm and the Harmony Search (HS) algorithm. Various benchmark functions with different characteristics are used for the evaluation of these algorithms. The experimental results show that the solution quality of the algorithms is not directly related to their robustness. In particular, the algorithm that is highly robust can have a low solution quality, or the algorithm that has a high quality of solution can be quite sensitive to the parameter variations.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] Z. W. Geem, J. H. Kim and G. V. Loganathan, "A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search", Simulation, Transaction of the Society for Modelling and Simulation International, 2001, pp. 60-68.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3551] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4467]


[2] J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, "Particle Swarm Optimization", Piscataway: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks IV, NJ: IEEE Press, 1995, pp.1942-1948.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 27967]


[3] R. Storn, K. Price, "Differential Evolution; A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces", Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, vol. 11, pp. 341-359.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14380] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18091]


[4] J. H. Kim, Z. W. Geem, and E.S. Kim, "Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum model Using Harmony Search", 2001, Journal American Water Resources Assocciation, pp.1131-1138.

[5] N. T. Melita, S. Holban, "A Genetic Algorithm Approach to DNA Microarrays Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer", 9th. International Conference on Development and Application Systems, 2008, pp. 289-294.

[6] E. Masehian, D. Sedighizadeh, "Multi-objective PSO and NPSO-based Algorithms for Robot Path Planning", Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2010, vol.10, no.4, pp.69-76.
[CrossRef] [Full Text] [Web of Science Times Cited 46] [SCOPUS Times Cited 58]


[7] N. Karaboga, B. Cetinkaya, "Design of Digital FIR Filters Using Differential Evolution Algorithms ", Circuit Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, vol. 25, pp. 649-660.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 91] [SCOPUS Times Cited 115]


[8] D. Karaboga, B. Akay, "A Comparative Study of Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2009, no. 214, pp.108-132.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2000] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2536]


[9] Y. Shi, R. Eberhart, "Comparing Inertia Weights and Constriction Factors in Particle Swarm Optimization", Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2000, pp. 84-88.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2641]


[10] A.S.D. Dymond, A.P. Engelbrecht, and P.S. Heyns, "The Sensitivity of Single Objective Optimization Algorithm Control Parameter Values Under Different Computational Constraints", Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE Congress, 2011, pp. 1412-1419.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[11] K. Zaplatilek, M. Talpa, and J. Leuchter, "Optimization Algorithms Testing and Convergence by Using a Stacked Histogram", Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2011, vol.11, no.1, pp. 11-16.
[CrossRef] [Full Text] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2]


[12] S. Smit, A. Eiben, "Comparing Parameter Tuning Methods for Evolutionary Algorithms", IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2009, pp. 399-406.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 147] [SCOPUS Times Cited 192]


[13] M. Mahdavi, M. Fesanghary, and E. Damangir, "An Improved Harmony Search Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007 pp. 1567-1579.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1278] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1570]


[14] A. Ghosh, S. Das, A. Chowdhury, and R. Giri, "An Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm with Fitness Adaptation of the Control Parameters", Information Sciences, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 3749-3765.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 117] [SCOPUS Times Cited 133]


[15] M. M. Ali, P. Kaelo, "Improved Particle Swarm Optimization", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2008, vol.196, pp. 578-593.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 71] [SCOPUS Times Cited 100]


[16] A. Lihu, S. Holban, "A Study on the Minimal Number of Particles for a Simplified Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm", 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, 2011, pp. 299-303.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[17] I. Paenke, J. Branke, "Efficient Search for Robust Solutions by Means of Evolutionary Algorithms and Fitness Approximation", IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, vol.10, no.4, pp. 405-420.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 104] [SCOPUS Times Cited 130]


[18] S. Tsutsui, A. Ghosh, "Genetic Algorithms with a Robust Solution Searching Scheme", IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computing, 1997, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 201-208.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 228]


[19] M. R. Saadatmand, M. S. Panahi, and A. A. Atai, "On the Limitations of Classical Benchmark Functions for Evaluating robustness of evolutionary algorithms", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2010, pp. 3222-3229.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 11] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14]


[20] J. Branke, "Creating Robust Solutions by Means of an Evolutionary Algorithm", Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN V, 1998, pp. 119-128.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 147]


[21] R. Storn, "On the Usage of Differential Evolution for Function Optimization", Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), 1996, pp. 519-523.

[22] R. Storn, "Differential Evolution Design of an IIR-filter", Evolutionary Computation IEEE, 1996, pp. 268-273.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 173]


[23] Y. Shi, R. Eberhart, "Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization", Evolutionary Programming VIII. Springer, 1998, pp. 591-600.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2634]


[24] K. S. Lee, Z. W. Geem, "A New Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Continuous Engineering Optimization: Harmony Search Theory and Practice", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, pp. 3902-3933.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1165] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1468]


[25] Z. W. Geem, J.H. Kim, and G.V. Loganathan, "Harmony Search optimization: Application to pipe network design", International Journal of Modelling&Simulation, 2002, vol.22, no.2, pp. 125-133.

[26] Z. W. Geem, C. Tseng, and Y. Park, "Harmony Search for Generalized Orienteering Problem: Best touring in China", Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol.3412, pp.741-750.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 199]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 51,103 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 34,735 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 1,893 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 1,286 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2022-06-29 09:48 in 133 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2022
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: