Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Feb 2024
Next issue: May 2024
Avg review time: 55 days
Avg accept to publ: 60 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,579,849 unique visits
1,024,892 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
SemanticScholar


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Application of the Voltage Control Technique and MPPT of Stand-alone PV System with Storage, HIVZIEFENDIC, J., VUIC, L., LALE, S., SARIC, M.
Issue 1/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  4/2015 - 1
View TOC | « Previous Article | Next Article »

 HIGHLY CITED PAPER 

Expediting P2P Video Delivery through a Hybrid Push-Pull Protocol

LEE, C. See more information about LEE, C. on SCOPUS See more information about LEE, C. on IEEExplore See more information about LEE, C. on Web of Science, KIM, S. See more information about  KIM, S. on SCOPUS See more information about  KIM, S. on SCOPUS See more information about KIM, S. on Web of Science, KIM, E. See more information about KIM, E. on SCOPUS See more information about KIM, E. on SCOPUS See more information about KIM, E. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (1,311 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 1,432 | Views: 4,058

Author keywords
computer networks, content distribution networks, distributed computing, peer to peer computing, streaming media

References keywords
streaming(19), peer(18), live(12), communications(12), video(9), internet(7), network(6), systems(5), pull(5), infocom(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2015-11-30
Volume 15, Issue 4, Year 2015, On page(s): 3 - 8
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2015.04001
Web of Science Accession Number: 000368499800001
SCOPUS ID: 84949952930

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
Despite the recent phenomenal success of peer-to-peer video streaming services, their stumbling performance for high-quality videos remains a major obstacle to wider acceptance. This is because high-resolution videos instantly delivered over the Internet are increasingly becoming the norm. This paper presents a novel solution to keep up with ever more challenging QoE expectations. Our proposal of a hybrid push-pull protocol consists of two key components, namely, a new push strategy and an elastic window scheme. The former empowers the hybrid protocol to make an informed push-pull decision based on chunk status and network condition, whereas the latter ensures balance between the two conflicting goals of chunk dissemination and playback deadline. The efficacy of the proposed protocol is validated through a performance study that demonstrates substantial gains compared to existing approaches.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] J. Liu, S. G. Rao, B. Li, and H. Zhang, "Opportunities and challenges of peer-to-peer Internet video broadcast," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 11-24, Jan. 2008.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 169] [SCOPUS Times Cited 243]


[2] X. Hei, C. Liang, J. Liang, Y. Liu, and K. Ross, "A measurement study of a large-scale P2P IPTV system," IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1672-1687, Dec. 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 455] [SCOPUS Times Cited 703]


[3] M. Zhang, Q. Zhang, L. Sun, and S. Yang, "Understanding the power of pull-based streaming protocol: can we do better?," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1678-1694, Dec. 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 120] [SCOPUS Times Cited 204]


[4] X. Hei, Y. Liu, and K. Ross, "Inferring network-wide quality in P2P live streaming systems," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1640-1654, Dec. 2007.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 84] [SCOPUS Times Cited 141]


[5] D. Kim, E. Kim, and C. Lee, "Efficient peer-to-peer overlay networks for mobile IPTV services," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2303-2309, Nov. 2010.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 12] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14]


[6] C. Lee, E. Hwang, and D. Pyeon, "A popularity-aware prefetching scheme to support interactive P2P streaming," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 382-388, May 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 9] [SCOPUS Times Cited 9]


[7] L. Yu, L. Gao, J. Zhao, and X. Wang, "SonicVoD: a VCR-supported P2P-VoD system with network coding," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 576-582, May 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14] [SCOPUS Times Cited 19]


[8] L. Garcia, L. Arnaiz, F. Alvarez, and J. M. Menendez, "Protected seamless content delivery in P2P wireless and wired networks," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 50-57, Oct. 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 5] [SCOPUS Times Cited 9]


[9] N. Ramzan, E. Quacchio, T. Zgaljic, S. Asioli, L. Celetto, E. Izquierdo, and F. Rovati, "Peer-to-peer streaming of scalable video in future Internet applications," IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 128-135, Mar. 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 29] [SCOPUS Times Cited 34]


[10] B. Li, S. Xie, Y. Qu, G. Y. Keung, C. Lin, J. Liu, and X. Zhang, "Inside the new CoolStreaming: principles, measurements, and performance implications," in Proc. the 27th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Apr. 2008, pp. 1705-1713.
[CrossRef]


[11] A. Russo and R. L. Cigno, "Delay-aware push/pull protocols for live video streaming in P2P systems," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications, Cape Town, South Africa, May 2010, pp. 1-5.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 17]


[12] T. Bonald, L. Massoulie, F. Mathieu, D. Perino, and A. Twigg, "Epidemic live streaming: optimal performance trade-offs," in Proc. ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Annapolis, MD, USA, Jun. 2008, pp. 325-336.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 168]


[13] D. Jo, S. Helal, E. Kim, W. Lee, and C. Lee, "Adaptive push-pull protocols for P2P-based video streaming," IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E94-B, no. 10 pp. 2759-2762, Oct. 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[14] D. Ren, Y. H. Li, and S. G. Chan, "On reducing mesh delay for peer-to-peer live streaming," in Proc. the 27th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Apr. 2008, pp. 1732-1740.
[CrossRef]


[15] A. Ghanbari, H. R. Rabiee, M. Khansari, and M. Salehi, "PPM - A hybrid push-pull mesh-based peer-to-peer live video streaming protocol," in Proc. the 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, Munich, Germany, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-8.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 11]


[16] N. Magharei and R. Rejaie, "PRIME: peer-to-peer receiver-driven mesh-based streaming," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1052-1065, Aug. 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 96] [SCOPUS Times Cited 148]


[17] B. Wong, A. Slivkins, and E. Sirer, "Meridian: a lightweight network location service without virtual coordinates," in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2005, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Aug. 2005, pp. 85-96.
[CrossRef]


[18] C. Ashwin, R. Bharambe, and V. Padmanabhan, "Analyzing and improving a BitTorrent network's performance mechanisms," in Proc. the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006, pp. 1-12.

[19] E. Veloso, V. Almeida, W. Meira, A. Bestavros, and S. Jin, "A hierarchical characterization of a live streaming media workload," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133-146, Feb. 2006.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 58] [SCOPUS Times Cited 88]


[20] K. Sripanidkulchai, B. Maggs, and H. Zhang, "An analysis of live streaming workloads on the Internet," in Proc. the 4th ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Taormina, Italy, Oct. 2004, pp. 41-54.
[CrossRef]


[21] F. Wang, Y. Xiong, and J. Liu, "mTreebone: a hybrid tree/mesh overlay for application-layer live video multicast," in Proc. the 27th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, Jun. 2007, pp. 49-56.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 159]


[22] F. Wang, J. Liu, and Y. Xiong, "Stable peers: existence, importance, and application in peer-to-peer live video streaming," in Proc. the 27th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Apr. 2008, pp. 2038-2046.
[CrossRef]


[23] C. Wu, B. Li, and S. Zhao, "Diagnosing network-wide P2P live streaming inefficiencies", in Proc. the 28th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications - Mini-Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Apr. 2009, pp. 2731-2735.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 46]


[24] X. Zhang and H. Hassanein, "TreeClimer: a network-driven push-pull hybrid scheme for peer-to-peer video live streaming," in Proc. the 35th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Denver, CO, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 368-371.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[25] C. G. Gurler, S. S. Savas, and A. M. Tekalp, "Variable chunk size and adaptive scheduling window for P2P streaming of scalable video," in Proc. the 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Orlando, FL, USA, Sep. 2012, pp. 2253-2256.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 13]


[26] C. Lee and E. Kim, "Boosting P2P streaming performance via adaptive chunk selection," IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E94-B, no.10, pp. 2755-2758, Oct. 2011.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 13]


[27] A. Vlavianos, M. Iliofotou, and M. Faloutsos, "BiToS: Enhancing BitTorrent for supporting streaming applications," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM Global Internet Symposium 2006, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006, pp. 1-6.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 237]


[28] D. Wu, Y. Zeng, J. He, Y. Liang, and Y. Wen, "On P2P mechanisms for VM image distribution in cloud data centers: modeling, analysis, and improvement," in Proc. the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Taipei, Taiwan, Dec. 2012, pp. 50-57.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14]


[29] R. Bruno and P. Ferreira, "SCADAMAR: Scalable and data-efficient Internet MapReduce," in Proc. the 2nd International Workshop on CrossCloud Systems, Bordeaux, France, Dec. 2014.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 5]


[30] X. Leon, R. Chaabouni, M. Sanchez-Artigas, and P. Garcia-Lopez, "Smart cloud seeding for BitTorrent in datacenters," IEEE Internet Computing, vol.18, no.4, pp.47-54, Jul.-Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef]


[31] A. H. Payberah, H. Kavalionak, V. Kumaresan, A. Montresor, and S. Haridi, "Clive: cloud-assisted P2P live streaming," in Proc. the 12th International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, Tarragona, Spain, Sep. 2012, pp. 79-90.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 64]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 1,073 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 2,369 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 34 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 74 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-05-15 07:26 in 196 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy