Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Feb 2024
Next issue: May 2024
Avg review time: 76 days
Avg accept to publ: 48 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,527,425 unique visits
1,003,648 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
bingbot
Googlebot
SemanticScholar


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Analysis of the Hybrid PSO-InC MPPT for Different Partial Shading Conditions, LEOPOLDINO, A. L. M., FREITAS, C. M., MONTEIRO, L. F. C.
Issue 2/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  1/2019 - 12
View TOC | « Previous Article | Next Article »

Adaptive Quality Control Scheme Based on VBR Characteristics to Improve QoE of UHD Streaming Service

KIM, M. See more information about KIM, M. on SCOPUS See more information about KIM, M. on IEEExplore See more information about KIM, M. on Web of Science, CHUNG, K. See more information about CHUNG, K. on SCOPUS See more information about CHUNG, K. on SCOPUS See more information about CHUNG, K. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (1,313 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 792 | Views: 2,303

Author keywords
adaptive control, data transfer, high definition video, quality of service, streaming media

References keywords
streaming(16), communications(12), video(11), adaptation(11), adaptive(9), quality(7), rate(6), experience(6), bitrate(6), tutorials(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-02-28
Volume 19, Issue 1, Year 2019, On page(s): 89 - 98
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.01012
Web of Science Accession Number: 000459986900012
SCOPUS ID: 85064214463

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
Recently, with the development of networks and smart devices, the demand for Ultra High Definition (UHD) video has risen, and HTTP adaptive streaming has attracted attention. HTTP adaptive streaming can guarantee high Quality of Experience (QoE) because it adaptively selects the video quality according to the network state. However, the existing quality control schemes experience unnecessary quality changes and low average video quality due to the bandwidth measurement and the quality control that do not consider the Variable Bit Rate (VBR) content characteristics of the UHD video. In this paper, we propose an adaptive quality control scheme based on VBR content characteristics to improve QoE of UHD streaming service. The proposed scheme measures the bandwidth using the actual bit rate of the segment and the difference in the network adaptability between segments. Furthermore, the proposed scheme defines a quality control region by considering the buffer state of the client. The quality control region consists of four subregions based on buffer thresholds, and the client selects the quality differently according to each subregion. Experimental results have shown that the proposed scheme improves the QoE compared to the existing schemes by minimizing the unnecessary quality changes and maximizing the average video quality.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] Cisco, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016-2021," Mar. 2017.

[2] J. Kua, G. Armitage, and P. Branch, "A Survey of Rate Adaptation Techniques for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 1842-1866, Mar. 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 179] [SCOPUS Times Cited 213]


[3] Microsoft, "Microsoft Smooth Streaming," 2016. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[4] Apple, "Apple HTTP Live Streaming," 2016. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[5] Adobe, "Adobe HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS)," 2016. [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[6] T. Stockhammer, "Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP: Standards and Design Principles," Proc. of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems, pp. 133-144, Feb. 2011.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 970]


[7] M. Seufert, S. Egger, M. Slanina, T. Zinner, T. Hossfeld, and P. T. Gia, "A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 469-492, Sep. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 517] [SCOPUS Times Cited 638]


[8] T. Zhao, Q. Liu, and C. W. Chen, "QoE in Video Transmission: A User Experience-Driven Strategy," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 285-302. Oct. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 98] [SCOPUS Times Cited 119]


[9] Y. Sani, A. Mauthe, and C. Edwards, "Adaptive Bitrate Selection: A Survey," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 2985-3014. Jul. 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 57] [SCOPUS Times Cited 69]


[10] Y. Zhou, Y. Duan, J. Sun, and Z. Guo, "Towards Simple and Smooth Rate Adaptation for VBR Video in DASH," Proc. of IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference, pp. 9-12, Dec. 2014.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 16]


[11] F. Xie, M. T. Pourazad, P. Nasiopoulos, and J. Slevinsky, "Determining Bitrate Requirement for UHD Video Content Delivery," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, pp. 241-242, Jan. 2016.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[12] T. Nagashima, K. Kanai, and J. Katto, "QoS and QoE Evaluations of 2K and 4K DASH Contents Distributions," Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pp. 453-458, Dec. 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1]


[13] T. Zhang, F. Ren, W. Cheng, X. Luo, R. Shu, and X. Liu, "Modeling and Analyzing The Influence of Chunk Size Variation on Bitrate Adaptation in DASH," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1-9, May 2017.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 27]


[14] S. Bae, D. Jang, and K. Park, "Why Is HTTP Adaptive Streaming So Hard?," Proc. of the Asia-Pacific Workshops on Systems, Jul. 2015.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 15]


[15] Y. Liu and J. Y. B. Lee, "Streaming Variable Bitrate Video over Mobile Networks with Predictable Performance," Proc. of the IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference, pp. 1-7, Apr. 2016.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[16] K. Brunnstrom et al., "Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience," Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience Output from the 5th Qualinet Meeting, 2013.

[17] N. Staelens, M. H. Pinson, P. Corriveau, F. De Turck, and P. Demeester, "Measuring Video Quality in the Network: From Quality of Service to User Experience," Proc. of the International Workshop Video Process. Consumer Electron, pp. 5-6, 2015.

[18] H. Nam, K. H. Kim, and H. Schulzrinne, "QoE Matters More Than QoS: Why People Stop Watching Cat Videos," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1-9, Apr. 2016.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 95]


[19] P. Juluri, V. Tamarapalli, and D. Medhi, "Measurement of Quality of Experience of Video-on-Demand Services: A Survey," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 401-418. Feb. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 146] [SCOPUS Times Cited 182]


[20] C. Liu, I. Bouazizi, and M. Gabbouj, "Rate Adaptation for Adaptive HTTP Streaming," Proc. of the ACM Multimedia Systems, pp. 169-174, Feb. 2011.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 389]


[21] T. C. Thang, Q. D. Ho, J. W. Kang, and A. T. Pham, "Adaptive Streaming of Audiovisual Content using MPEG DASH," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 78-85, Mar. 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 168] [SCOPUS Times Cited 198]


[22] Z. Li, X. Zhu, J. Gahm, R. Pan, H. Hu, A. C. Began, and D. Oran, "Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 719-733, Apr. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 396] [SCOPUS Times Cited 464]


[23] H. T. Le, D. V. Nguyen, N. P. Ngoc, A. T. Pham, and T. C. Thang, "Buffer-based Bitrate Adaptation for Adaptive HTTP Streaming," Proc. of the International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications, pp. 33-38, Oct. 2013.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 41]


[24] T. Huang, R. Johari, N. McKeown, M. Trunnell, and M. Waston, "A Buffer-based Approach to Rate Adaptation: Evidence from a Large Video Streaming Service," Proc. of the ACM Conference on SIGCOMM, pp. 187-198, Aug. 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 413]


[25] K. Spiteri, R. Urgaonkar, and R. K. Sitaraman, "BOLA: Near-optimal Bitrate Adaptation for Online Videos," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1-9, Apr. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 366] [SCOPUS Times Cited 425]


[26] P. Juluri, V. Tanarapalli, and D. Medhi, "SARA: Segment Aware Rate Adaptation Algorithm for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP," Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop, pp. 1765-1770, Jun. 2015.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 142]


[27] T. Vu, H. T. Le, D. V. Nguyen, N. P. Ngoc, and T. C. Thang, "Future Buffer Based Adaptation for VBR Video Streaming over HTTP," Proc. of the International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 1-5, Oct. 2015.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[28] H. N. Nguyen, T. Vu, H. T. Le, N. P. Ngoc, and T. C. Thang, "Smooth Quality Adaptation Method for VBR Video Streaming over HTTP," Proc. of the International Conference on Communications, Management and Telecommunications, pp. 184-185, Dec. 2015.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[29] The Network Simulator NS-3, [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document



References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 2,341 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 4,028 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 78 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 134 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-04-17 20:09 in 166 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy