Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Feb 2024
Next issue: May 2024
Avg review time: 78 days
Avg accept to publ: 48 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,521,793 unique visits
1,001,828 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
bingbot


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Analysis of the Hybrid PSO-InC MPPT for Different Partial Shading Conditions, LEOPOLDINO, A. L. M., FREITAS, C. M., MONTEIRO, L. F. C.
Issue 2/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  3/2019 - 12
View TOC | « Previous Article | Next Article »

 HIGH-IMPACT PAPER 

Spatial Video Forgery Detection and Localization using Texture Analysis of Consecutive Frames

SADDIQUE, M. See more information about SADDIQUE, M. on SCOPUS See more information about SADDIQUE, M. on IEEExplore See more information about SADDIQUE, M. on Web of Science, ASGHAR, K. See more information about  ASGHAR, K. on SCOPUS See more information about  ASGHAR, K. on SCOPUS See more information about ASGHAR, K. on Web of Science, BAJWA, U. I. See more information about  BAJWA, U. I. on SCOPUS See more information about  BAJWA, U. I. on SCOPUS See more information about BAJWA, U. I. on Web of Science, HUSSAIN, M. See more information about  HUSSAIN, M. on SCOPUS See more information about  HUSSAIN, M. on SCOPUS See more information about HUSSAIN, M. on Web of Science, HABIB, Z. See more information about HABIB, Z. on SCOPUS See more information about HABIB, Z. on SCOPUS See more information about HABIB, Z. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (1,374 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 1,370 | Views: 3,105

Author keywords
forensics, image classification, machine learning, multimedia systems

References keywords
detection(25), video(23), image(17), forgery(16), processing(15), multimedia(10), digital(10), signal(9), object(8), pattern(7)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-08-31
Volume 19, Issue 3, Year 2019, On page(s): 97 - 108
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.03012
Web of Science Accession Number: 000486574100012
SCOPUS ID: 85072162917

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
Now-a-days, videos can be easily recorded and forged with user-friendly editing tools. These videos can be shared on social networks to make false propaganda. During the process of spatial forgery, the texture and micro-patterns of the frames become inconsistent, which can be observed in the difference of two consecutive frames. Based on this observation, a method has been proposed for detection of forged video segments and localization of forged frames. Employing the Chrominance value of Consecutive frame Difference (CCD) and Discriminative Robust Local Binary Pattern (DRLBP), a new descriptor is introduced to model the inconsistency embedded in the frames due to forgery. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to detect whether the pair of consecutive frames is forged. If at least one pair of consecutive frames is detected as forged, the video segment is predicted as forged and the forged frames are localized. Intensive experiments are performed to validate the performance of the method on a combined dataset of videos, which were tampered by copy-move and splicing methods. The detection accuracy on large dataset is 96.68 percent and video accuracy is 98.32 percent. The comparison shows that it outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, even through cross dataset validation.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] C. Richao, Y. Gaobo, and Z. Ningbo, "Detection of object-based manipulation by the statistical features of object contour", Forensic science international, vol. 236, pp. 164-169, 2014,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 40] [SCOPUS Times Cited 48]


[2] K. Asghar, Z. Habib, and M. Hussain, "Copy-move and splicing image forgery detection and localization techniques: a review", Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, pp. 1-27, 2016,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 67] [SCOPUS Times Cited 81]


[3] R. C. Pandey, S. K. Singh, and K. K. Shukla, "Passive forensics in image and video using noise features: A review", Digital Investigation, vol. 19, pp. 1-28, 2016,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 33] [SCOPUS Times Cited 49]


[4] R. D. Singh and N. Aggarwal, "Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey", Multimedia Systems, pp. 1-30, 2017,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 60] [SCOPUS Times Cited 81]


[5] K. Sitara and B. Mehtre, "Digital video tampering detection: An overview of passive techniques", Digital Investigation, vol. 18, pp. 8-22, 2016,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 80] [SCOPUS Times Cited 103]


[6] A. Alahmadi, M. Hussain, H. Aboalsamh, G. Muhammad, G. Bebis, and H. Mathkour, "Passive detection of image forgery using DCT and local binary pattern", Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 11, pp. 81-88, 2017,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 70] [SCOPUS Times Cited 104]


[7] B. Yang, X. Sun, H. Guo, Z. Xia, and X. Chen, "A copy-move forgery detection method based on CMFD-SIFT", Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, pp. 837-855, 2018,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 49] [SCOPUS Times Cited 78]


[8] P. Aflaki, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj, "Subjective quality assessment of asymmetric stereoscopic 3D video", Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 9, pp. 331-345, 2015,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 26] [SCOPUS Times Cited 34]


[9] A. Subramanyam and S. Emmanuel, "Video forgery detection using HOG features and compression properties", in Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012 IEEE 14th International Workshop on, Banff Center Banff, AB, Canada, 2012, pp. 89-94,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 124]


[10] Z. Guo, L. Zhang, and D. Zhang, "A completed modeling of local binary pattern operator for texture classification", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, pp. 1657-1663, 2010,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1475] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1880]


[11] J. Ren, X. Jiang, and J. Yuan, "Noise-resistant local binary pattern with an embedded error-correction mechanism", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, pp. 4049-4060, 2013,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 181] [SCOPUS Times Cited 212]


[12] J. Zhang, K. Huang, Y. Yu, and T. Tan, "Boosted local structured hog-lbp for object localization", in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on, 2011, pp. 1393-1400,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 140]


[13] C.-C. Hsu, T.-Y. Hung, C.-W. Lin, and C.-T. Hsu, "Video forgery detection using correlation of noise residue", in Multimedia Signal Processing, 2008 IEEE 10th Workshop on, Queensland, Australia, 2008, pp. 170-174,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 111] [SCOPUS Times Cited 165]


[14] G. Singh and K. Singh, "Video frame and region duplication forgery detection based on correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation", Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1-36, 2018,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 27] [SCOPUS Times Cited 40]


[15] L. Su, T. Huang, and J. Yang, "A video forgery detection algorithm based on compressive sensing", Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 74, pp. 1-16, 2014,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 29] [SCOPUS Times Cited 38]


[16] S. Chen, S. Tan, B. Li, and J. Huang, "Automatic detection of object-based forgery in advanced video", IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 26, pp. 2138-2151, 2016,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 92] [SCOPUS Times Cited 110]


[17] M. Kobayashi, T. Okabe, and Y. Sato, "Detecting video forgeries based on noise characteristics," in Advances in Image and Video Technology. vol. 5414, ed: Springer, 2009, pp. 306-317,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 51]


[18] D.-K. Hyun, S.-J. Ryu, H.-Y. Lee, and H.-K. Lee, "Detection of upscale-crop and partial manipulation in surveillance video based on sensor pattern noise", Sensors, vol. 13, pp. 12605-12631, 2013,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 27]


[19] R. D. Singh and N. Aggarwal, "Detection of upscale-crop and splicing for digital video authentication", Digital Investigation, vol. 21, pp. 31-52, 2017,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 24]


[20] R. C. Pandey, S. K. Singh, and K. Shukla, "Passive copy-move forgery detection in videos", in Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 301-306,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 44]


[21] J. Goodwin and G. Chetty, "Blind video tamper detection based on fusion of source features", in Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 2011 International Conference on, 2011, pp. 608-613,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20]


[22] A. Bidokhti and S. Ghaemmaghami, "Detection of regional copy/move forgery in MPEG videos using optical flow", in Artificial intelligence and signal processing (AISP), 2015 International symposium on, 2015, pp. 13-17,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 37]


[23] C. Guo, G. Luo, and Y. Zhu, "A detection method for facial expression reenacted forgery in videos", in Tenth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2018), 2018, p. 108061J,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4]


[24] O. I. Al-Sanjary, A. A. Ahmed, A. A. B. Jaharadak, M. A. Ali, and H. M. Zangana, "Detection clone an object movement using an optical flow approach", in 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), 2018, pp. 388-394,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 35]


[25] L. Su and C. Li, "A novel passive forgery detection algorithm for video region duplication", Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 29, pp. 1173-1190, 2018,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 21] [SCOPUS Times Cited 24]


[26] L. Li, X. Wang, W. Zhang, G. Yang, and G. Hu, "Detecting removed object from video with stationary background", in The International Workshop on Digital Forensics and Watermarking 2012, 2013, pp. 242-252,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 22]


[27] V. Conotter, J. F. O'Brien, and H. Farid, "Exposing digital forgeries in ballistic motion", IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, vol. 7, pp. 283-296, 2012,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 43] [SCOPUS Times Cited 60]


[28] M. Zampoglou, F. Markatopoulou, G. Mercier, D. Touska, E. Apostolidis, S. Papadopoulos, R. Cozien, I. Patras, V. Mezaris, and I. Kompatsiaris, "Detecting Tampered Videos with Multimedia Forensics and Deep Learning", in International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, 2019, pp. 374-386,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 15] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18]


[29] Y. Yao, Y. Shi, S. Weng, and B. Guan, "Deep learning for detection of object-based forgery in advanced video", Symmetry, vol. 10, p. 3, 2017,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 43] [SCOPUS Times Cited 55]


[30] A. Satpathy, X. Jiang, and H.-L. Eng, "LBP-based edge-texture features for object recognition", Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, pp. 1953-1964, 2014,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 178] [SCOPUS Times Cited 226]


[31] G. Muhammad, M. H. Al-Hammadi, M. Hussain, and G. Bebis, "Image forgery detection using steerable pyramid transform and local binary pattern", Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 25, pp. 985-995, 2014,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 121] [SCOPUS Times Cited 174]


[32] X. Zhao, S. Li, S. Wang, J. Li, and K. Yang, "Optimal chroma-like channel design for passive color image splicing detection", EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2012, pp. 1-11, 2012,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25]


[33] N. Dalal and B. Triggs, "Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection", in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 2005, pp. 886-893,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 21500] [SCOPUS Times Cited 28801]


[34] C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, "Support-vector networks", Machine learning, vol. 20, pp. 273-297, 1995,
[CrossRef]


[35] J. Y. Hesterman, L. Caucci, M. A. Kupinski, H. H. Barrett, and L. R. Furenlid, "Maximum-likelihood estimation with a contracting-grid search algorithm", IEEE transactions on nuclear science, vol. 57, pp. 1077-1084, 2010,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 91] [SCOPUS Times Cited 104]


[36] P. Bestagini, S. Milani, M. Tagliasacchi, and S. Tubaro, "Local tampering detection in video sequences", in Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2013 IEEE 15th International Workshop on, Pula (CA), Italy, 2013, pp. 488-493,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 124]


[37] G. Qadir, S. Yahaya, and A. T. Ho, "Surrey university library for forensic analysis (SULFA) of video content", in Image Processing (IPR 2012), IET Conference on, London, UK, 2012, pp. 1-6,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 69]


[38] E. Ardizzone and G. Mazzola, "A Tool to Support the Creation of Datasets of Tampered Videos," in Image Analysis and Processing-ICIAP 2015, ed: Springer, 2015, pp. 665-675.,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20]


[39] G. Jin and X. Wan, "An improved method for SIFT-based copy-move forgery detection using non-maximum value suppression and optimized J-Linkage", Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2017,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 42] [SCOPUS Times Cited 60]


[40] C.-M. Pun, X.-C. Yuan, and X.-L. Bi, "Image forgery detection using adaptive oversegmentation and feature point matching", IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, vol. 10, pp. 1705-1716, 2015,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 184] [SCOPUS Times Cited 251]


[41] W. Wang and H. Farid, "Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting duplication", in Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Multimedia & security, New York, USA, 2007, pp. 35-42,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 184]


[42] L. Shiqi, T. Shengwei, Y. Long, Y. Jiong, and S. Hua, "Android malicious code Classification using Deep Belief Network", KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, vol. 12, 2018,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 15] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25]


[43] X. Liu, S. Lin, J. Fang, and Z. Xu, "Is extreme learning machine feasible? A theoretical assessment (Part I)", Neural Networks and Learning Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 7-20, 2015,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 123] [SCOPUS Times Cited 141]


[44] K. Weiss, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D. Wang, "A survey of transfer learning", Journal of Big Data, vol. 3, pp. 1-40, 2016,
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3402]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 24,781 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 37,314 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 551 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 829 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-04-14 00:22 in 251 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy