Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 1.221
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.961
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.5
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Aug 2021
Next issue: Nov 2021
Avg review time: 89 days


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

1,726,421 unique visits
569,576 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
bingbot
PetalBot


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
 Volume 20 (2020)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2020
 
 
 Volume 19 (2019)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2019
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2019
 
 
 Volume 18 (2018)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2018
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2018
 
 
 Volume 17 (2017)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2017
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2017
 
 
  View all issues  




SAMPLE ARTICLES

Method for Efficiency Increasing of Distributed Classification of the Images based on the Proactive Parallel Computing Approach, MUKHIN, V., VOLOKYTA, A., HERIATOVYCH, Y., REHIDA, P.
Issue 2/2018

AbstractPlus

Parameter Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Based Direct-Current Vector Control Strategy for Solar PV System, NAMMALVAR, P., RAMKUMAR, S.
Issue 1/2018

AbstractPlus

Robust 2-bit Quantization of Weights in Neural Network Modeled by Laplacian Distribution, PERIC, Z., DENIC, B., DINCIC, M., NIKOLIC, J.
Issue 3/2021

AbstractPlus

Simple Framework for Efficient Development of the Functional Requirement Verification-specific Language, POPIC, S., TESLIC, N., BJELICA, M. Z.
Issue 3/2021

AbstractPlus

A Phasor Estimation Algorithm based on Hilbert Transform for P-class PMUs, RAZO-HERNANDEZ, J. R., VALTIERRA-RODRIGUEZ, M., GRANADOS-LIEBERMAN, D., TAPIA-TINOCO, G., RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, J. R.
Issue 3/2018

AbstractPlus

Differential Evolution Implementation for Power Quality Disturbances Monitoring using OpenCL, SOLIS-MUNOZ, F. J., OSORNIO-RIOS, R. A., ROMERO-TRONCOSO, R. J., JAEN-CUELLAR, A. Y.
Issue 2/2019

AbstractPlus




LATEST NEWS

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

2021-Jun-06
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2020, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2017-2020 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2020 is 2.5, better than all our previous results.

2021-Apr-15
Release of the v3 version of AECE Journal website. We moved to a new server and implemented the latest cryptographic protocols to assure better compatibility with the most recent browsers. Our website accepts now only TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 secure connections.

2020-Jun-29
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2019. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.102 (1.023 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.734.

2020-Jun-11
Starting on the 15th of June 2020 we wiil introduce a new policy for reviewers. Reviewers who provide timely and substantial comments will receive a discount voucher entitling them to an APC reduction. Vouchers (worth of 25 EUR or 50 EUR, depending on the review quality) will be assigned to reviewers after the final decision of the reviewed paper is given. Vouchers issued to specific individuals are not transferable.

Read More »


    
 

  3/2019 - 4

A Novel Power Curve Modeling Framework for Wind Turbines

YESILBUDAK, M. See more information about YESILBUDAK, M. on SCOPUS See more information about YESILBUDAK, M. on IEEExplore See more information about YESILBUDAK, M. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (765 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 601 | Views: 1,220

Author keywords
optimization methods, parameter estimation, partitioning algorithms, power engineering computing, wind energy generation

References keywords
wind(22), power(20), energy(17), curve(13), turbine(11), renewable(7), algorithm(6), systems(5), optimization(5), modeling(5)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2019-08-31
Volume 19, Issue 3, Year 2019, On page(s): 29 - 40
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2019.03004
Web of Science Accession Number: 000486574100004
SCOPUS ID: 85072171926

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
This paper presents two main novelties concerning power curve modeling of wind turbines. First novelty lies in the hybridization of 5 widely-used parametric functions and 8 recently-developed metaheuristic optimization algorithms. While constructing new hybrid power curve models, design coefficients of 4-parameter and 5-parameter logistic, 5th-order and 6th-order polynomial and modified hyperbolic tangent functions are fitted with ant lion, grey wolf, moth-flame and multi-verse optimizers and whale optimization, sine cosine, salp swarm and dragonfly algorithms. The best hybrid power curve model is achieved by the grey wolf optimizer-based modified hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the goodness-of-fit indicators. Second novelty lies in the integration of a well-known partitional clustering method to the best hybrid power curve model developed. While building a novel integrative power curve model, design coefficients of grey wolf optimizer-based modified hyperbolic tangent function are solved using only the highly representative data points identified by the Squared Euclidean-based k-means clustering algorithm. The operational characteristics of the wind turbine power curve are reflected with a higher accuracy. As a crucial result, the proposed power curve modeling framework is shown to be superior for wind turbines.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] E. Sainz, A. Llombart, J. J. Guerrero, "Robust Filtering for the Characterization of Wind Turbines: Improving Its Operation and Maintenance", Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2136-2147, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 35] [SCOPUS Times Cited 55]


[2] M. Lydia, S. S. Kumar, A. I. Selvakumar, G. E. P. Kumar, "Wind Resource Estimation Using Wind Speed and Power Curve Models", Renewable Energy, vol. 83, pp. 425-434, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 26] [SCOPUS Times Cited 29]


[3] A. Marvuglia, A. Messineo, "Monitoring of Wind Farms’ Power Curves Using Machine Learning Techniques", Applied Energy, vol. 98, pp. 574-583, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 117] [SCOPUS Times Cited 138]


[4] L. C. Pagnini, M. Burlando, M. P. Repetto, "Experimental Power Curve of Small-Size Wind Turbines in Turbulent Urban Environment", Applied Energy, vol. 154, pp. 112-121, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 107] [SCOPUS Times Cited 118]


[5] H. Long, L. Wang, Z. Zhang, Z. Song, J. Xu, "Data-Driven Wind Turbine Power Generation Performance Monitoring", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 6627-6635, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 42] [SCOPUS Times Cited 46]


[6] T. P. Chang, F. J. Liu, H. H. Ko, S. P. Cheng, S. C. Kuo, "Comparative Analysis on Power Curve Models of Wind Turbine Generator in Estimating Capacity Factor", Energy, vol. 73, pp. 88-95, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 71] [SCOPUS Times Cited 87]


[7] J. Yan, T. Ouyang, "Advanced Wind Power Prediction Based on Data-Driven Error Correction", Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 180, pp. 302-311, Jan. 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 27] [SCOPUS Times Cited 33]


[8] S. Seo, S. D. Oh, H. Y. Kwak, "Wind Turbine Power Curve Modeling Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation Method", Renewable Energy, vol. 136, pp. 1164-1169, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 22]


[9] C. Kamalakannan, L. Padma, S. S. S. Dash, B. K. Panigrahi, "Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Systems", pp. 1407-1414, Springer, 2015.

[10] M. Lydia, A. I. Selvakumar, S. S. Kumar, G. E. P. Kumar, "Advanced Algorithms for Wind Turbine Power Curve Modeling", IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 827-835, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 121] [SCOPUS Times Cited 160]


[11] D. Villanueva, A. Feijoo, "Comparison of Logistic Functions for Modeling Wind Turbine Power Curves", Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 155, pp. 281-288, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23] [SCOPUS Times Cited 28]


[12] M. Marciukaitis, I. Zutautaite, L. Martisauskas, B. Joksas, A. Sfetsos, "Non-Linear Regression Model for Wind Turbine Power Curve", Renewable Energy, vol. 113, pp. 732-741, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 39] [SCOPUS Times Cited 52]


[13] B. K. Saxena, K. V. S. Rao, "Comparison of Weibull Parameters Computation Methods and Analytical Estimation of Wind Turbine Capacity Factor Using Polynomial Power Curve Model: Case Study of a Wind Farm", Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-11, 2015.
[CrossRef]


[14] E. Taslimi-Renani, M. Modiri-Delshad, M. F. M. Elias, N. A. Rahim, "Development of an Enhanced Parametric Model for Wind Turbine Power Curve", Applied Energy, vol. 177, pp. 544-552, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 59] [SCOPUS Times Cited 71]


[15] F. Pelletier, C. Masson, A. Tahan, "Wind Turbine Power Curve Modelling Using Artificial Neural Network", Renewable Energy, vol. 89, pp. 207-214, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 89] [SCOPUS Times Cited 104]


[16] X. Liu, "An Improved Interpolation Method for Wind Power Curves", IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 528-534, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 14] [SCOPUS Times Cited 19]


[17] A. K. Das, "An Empirical Model of Power Curve of a Wind Turbine", Energy Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 507-518, 2014.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 7]


[18] C. Carrillo, A. F. Obando-Montano, J. Cidras, E. Diaz-Dorado, "Review of Power Curve Modelling for Wind Turbines", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 21, pp. 572-581, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 169] [SCOPUS Times Cited 201]


[19] M. Lydia, S. S. Kumar, A. I. Selvakumar, G. E. P. Kumar, "Comprehensive Review on Wind Turbine Power Curve Modeling Techniques", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 30, pp. 452-460, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 236] [SCOPUS Times Cited 292]


[20] S. Mirjalili, "The Ant Lion Optimizer", Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 83, pp. 80-98, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1094] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1318]


[21] S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, "Grey Wolf Optimizer", Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 69, pp. 46-61, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3999] [SCOPUS Times Cited 5069]


[22] S. Mirjalili, "Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm: A Novel Nature-Inspired Heuristic Paradigm", Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 89, pp. 228-249, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1206] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1455]


[23] S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, A. Hatamlou, "Multi-Verse Optimizer: A Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Global Optimization", Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 495-513, Feb. 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1112] [SCOPUS Times Cited 782]


[24] S. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, "The Whale Optimization Algorithm", Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 95, pp. 51-67, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2496] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3128]


[25] S. Mirjalili, "SCA: A Sine Cosine Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems", Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, pp. 120-133, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1120] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1383]


[26] S. Mirjalili, A. H. Gandomi, S. Z. Mirjalili, S. Saremi, H. Faris, S. M. Mirjalili, "Salp Swarm Algorithm: A Bio-Inspired Optimizer for Engineering Design Problems", Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 114, pp. 163-191, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1093] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1354]


[27] S. Mirjalili, "Dragonfly Algorithm: A New Meta-Heuristic Optimization Technique for Solving Single-Objective, Discrete, and Multi-Objective Problems", Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1053-1073, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 227] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1014]


[28] C. C. Aggarwal, C. K. Reddy, "Data Clustering: Algorithms and Applications", pp. 89-93, CRC Press, 2014.

[29] Open Platform for French Public Data & ENGIE, [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[30] M. Yesilbudak, "Implementation of Novel Hybrid Approaches for Power Curve Modeling of Wind Turbines", Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 171, pp. 156-169, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 19]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 13,558 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 16,984 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 437 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 548 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2021-09-14 11:40 in 176 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2021
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: