Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: May 2024
Next issue: Aug 2024
Avg review time: 57 days
Avg accept to publ: 60 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,621,740 unique visits
1,042,106 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
Googlebot
bingbot
SemanticScholar


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Application of the Voltage Control Technique and MPPT of Stand-alone PV System with Storage, HIVZIEFENDIC, J., VUIC, L., LALE, S., SARIC, M.
Issue 1/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  1/2020 - 4

A Novel Simulation Model for Pricing Different QoS Levels in IP Networks

RADONJIC DJOGATOVIC, V. See more information about RADONJIC DJOGATOVIC, V. on SCOPUS See more information about RADONJIC DJOGATOVIC, V. on IEEExplore See more information about RADONJIC DJOGATOVIC, V. on Web of Science, DJOGATOVIC, M. See more information about DJOGATOVIC, M. on SCOPUS See more information about DJOGATOVIC, M. on SCOPUS See more information about DJOGATOVIC, M. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (896 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 756 | Views: 1,827

Author keywords
decision making, IP networks, quality of service, programming, simulation

References keywords
simulation(11), pricing(10), networks(5), quality(4), discrete(4), communications(4)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2020-02-28
Volume 20, Issue 1, Year 2020, On page(s): 27 - 34
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2020.01004
Web of Science Accession Number: 000518392600004
SCOPUS ID: 85083703162

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
The selection of the appropriate pricing concept is one of the most important business decisions an Internet service provider (ISP) has to make. An efficient pricing concept implies that price reflects the quality of service (QoS) obtained by a service provider. In this paper, we propose four billing scenarios, each with applied user-centric QoS-based pricing concept, which is focused on users' demands, defined through QoS and price requirements, as well as delivered QoS. The main issue of this research is to analyse how much ISP's revenue will vary depending on the applied billing scenario. For this purpose, we propose a novel discrete event simulation model. he proposed simulation model is implemented using a newly created programming library based on the event scheduling strategy. This model can be helpful to an ISP in the process of decision making which billing scenario to choose in order to maximize its revenue. Output parameters obtained through the simulation analysis are ISP's revenue and service prices for different billing scenarios.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] ITU-T Recommendation E.800, Definitions of terms related to quality of service, 2008.

[2] J. Altmann, K. Chu, "How to charge for network services: flat-rate or usage-based?" Computer Networks, vol. 36, no. 5-6, pp. 519-531, 2001.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 41] [SCOPUS Times Cited 60]


[3] J. MacKie-Mason, L. Murphy, J. Murphy, "The role of responsive pricing in the Internet," The Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol.1, no.1&2, 1995.
[CrossRef]


[4] J. Chod, N. Rudi, "Resource flexibility with responsive pricing," Operations Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 532-548, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 153] [SCOPUS Times Cited 166]


[5] A. Nevo, J. L. Turner, J. W. Williams, "Usage-based pricing and demand for residential broadband," Econometrica, vol. 84, pp. 411-443, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 63] [SCOPUS Times Cited 63]


[6] S. Sen, C. Joe-Wong, S. Ha, M. Chiang, "Incentivizing time-shifting of data: A survey of time-dependent pricing for internet access," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 91-99, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 85] [SCOPUS Times Cited 109]


[7] A. Guerrero-Ibanez, J. Contreras-Castillo, A. Barba, A. Reyes, "A QoS-based dynamic pricing approach for services provisioning in heterogeneous wireless access networks," Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 569-583, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10]


[8] D. Elreedy, A. F. Atiya, H. Fayed, M. Saleh, "A framework for an agent-based dynamic pricing for broadband wireless price rate plans," Journal of Simulation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 96-110, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[9] B. Al-Manthari, N. Nasser, H. Hassanein, "Congestion pricing in wireless cellular networks," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 358-371, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 20] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25]


[10] V. Radonjic Đogatovic, M. Đogatovic, M. Stanojevic, "Simulation analysis of quality of business in IP networks," Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, [S.l.], 2018.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2]


[11] UsQoP - User-centric QoS-based pricing simulation model, from https://github.com/mdjogatovic/UsQoP, accessed on 11.11.2019.

[12] T. H. Rasmussen , N. Hansen, S. Lazarova-Molnar, "A discrete-event simulation tool for decision support in selecting project scheduling strategies", 7th International Conference ICMSAO, Sharjah, UAE, 2017, pp. 1-5.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[13] G. E. Vieira, M. Kuck, E. Frazzon, M. Freitag, Evaluating the robustness of production schedules using discrete-event simulation, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50, no. 1, 2017, pp. 7953-7958,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 28]


[14] F. M. Alam, S. Mohan, W. Fowler, M. Gopalakrishnan, "A discrete event simulation tool for performance management of web-based application systems," Journal of Simulation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp 21-32, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10]


[15] V. Đogatovic, A. Kostic-Ljubisavljevic, Telecommunications pricing fundamentals, pp. 53-58, University of Belgrade, 2015.

[16] R. Stankiewicz, P. Cholda, A. Jajszczyk, "QoX: What is It Really?," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 148-158, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 78] [SCOPUS Times Cited 102]


[17] S. Lindskog, E. Jonsson, "Adding Security to Quality of Service Architectures," Perspectives on Multimedia, R. Burnett, A. Brunstrom, A.G. Nilsson, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2003, pp.145-158.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6]


[18] G. I. Palmer, V. A. Knight, P. R. Harper, A. L. Hawa, "Ciw: An open-source discrete event simulation library," Journal of Simulation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 68-82, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20]


[19] M. A. Law, Simulation modeling and analysis, 5th Edition, pp. 93-102, McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.

[20] B. A. Downey, Think Python: How to think like a computer scientist, 2nd Edition, pp. 225, O'Reilly, 2015.

[21] D. Kashyap, J. Viradiya, "A Survey Of Various Load Balancing Algorithms In Cloud Computing," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 115-119, 2014.

[22] G. Allen, M. Owens, The definitive guide to SQLite, 2nd Edition, pp. 8-13, Apress Berkley, 2010.

[23] PYES - PYthon Event Scheduling simulation library, from https://github.com/mdjogatovic/pyes, accessed on 11.11.2019.

[24] P. Reichl, P. Zwickl, P. Maille, M. Varela, "What you pay is what you get?" Quality and User Experience, 3:5, 2018.
[CrossRef]


[25] M. Falkner, M. Devetsikiotis, I. Lambadaris, "An overview of pricing concepts for broadband IP networks," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2-13, 2000.
[CrossRef]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 489 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 607 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 19 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 23 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-06-08 03:50 in 115 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy