Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.700
JCR 5-Year IF: 0.700
SCOPUS CiteScore: 1.8
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Nov 2024
Next issue: Feb 2025
Avg review time: 59 days
Avg accept to publ: 60 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

3,171,262 unique visits
1,250,018 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
PetalBot
AhrefsBot
Googlebot
bingbot


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 24 (2024)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2024
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2024
 
 
 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
  View all issues  








LATEST NEWS

2024-Jun-20
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2023. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.700 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.600.

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

Read More »


  2/2022 - 3

Attention-Based Joint Semantic-Instance Segmentation of 3D Point Clouds

HAO, W. See more information about HAO, W. on SCOPUS See more information about HAO, W. on IEEExplore See more information about HAO, W. on Web of Science, WANG, H. See more information about  WANG, H. on SCOPUS See more information about  WANG, H. on SCOPUS See more information about WANG, H. on Web of Science, LIANG, W. See more information about  LIANG, W. on SCOPUS See more information about  LIANG, W. on SCOPUS See more information about LIANG, W. on Web of Science, ZHAO, M. See more information about  ZHAO, M. on SCOPUS See more information about  ZHAO, M. on SCOPUS See more information about ZHAO, M. on Web of Science, XIAO, Z. See more information about XIAO, Z. on SCOPUS See more information about XIAO, Z. on SCOPUS See more information about XIAO, Z. on Web of Science
 
Extra paper information in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar View the paper record and similar papers in Microsoft Bing View the paper record and similar papers in Semantic Scholar the AI-powered research tool
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (3,331 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 843 | Views: 2,006

Author keywords
computer graphics, object segmentation, feature extraction, pattern recognition, machine learning

References keywords
point(24), segmentation(22), pattern(19), instance(17), vision(15), semantic(15), recognition(15), cvpr(14), clouds(11), learning(8)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2022-05-31
Volume 22, Issue 2, Year 2022, On page(s): 19 - 28
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2022.02003
Web of Science Accession Number: 000810486800003
SCOPUS ID: 85131726998

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
In this paper, we propose an attention-based instance and semantic segmentation joint approach, termed ABJNet, for addressing the instance and semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds simultaneously. First, a point feature enrichment (PFE) module is used to enrich the segmentation networks input data by indicating the relative importance of each points neighbors. Then, a more efficient attention pooling operation is designed to establish a novel module for extracting point cloud features. Finally, an efficient attention-based joint segmentation module (ABJS) is proposed for combining semantic features and instance features in order to improve both segmentation tasks. We evaluate the proposed attention-based joint semantic-instance segmentation neural network (ABJNet) on a variety of indoor scene datasets, including S3DIS and ScanNet V2. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms the start-of-the-art method in 3D instance segmentation and significantly outperforms it in 3D semantic segmentation.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] J. Wu, J. Jiao, Q. Yang, Z. Zha, X. Chen, "Ground-aware point cloud semantic segmentation for autonomous driving," Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2019, pp.971-979.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 21]


[2] Y. Nie, J. Hou, X. Han and M. Nießner, "RfD-Net: Point scene understanding by semantic instance reconstruction," IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 4606-4616.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 38] [SCOPUS Times Cited 41]


[3] X. Wang, S. Liu, X. Shen, C. Shen, J. Jia, "Associatively segmenting instances and semantics in point clouds," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019, pp.4096-4105.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 175] [SCOPUS Times Cited 216]


[4] C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, L. J. Guibas, "Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space," International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 5105-5114.
[CrossRef]


[5] S. Qiu, S. Anwar, N. Barnes, "Semantic segmentation for real point cloud scenes via bilateral augmentation and adaptive fusion," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2021, pp.1757-1767.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 169] [SCOPUS Times Cited 207]


[6] S. Fan, Q. Dong, F. Zhu, Y. Lv, P. Ye, F.Y. Wang, "SCF-Net: Learning spatial contextual features for large-scale point cloud segmentation," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2021, pp. 14499-14508.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 172] [SCOPUS Times Cited 214]


[7] Y. Su, W. Liu, Z. Yuan, et al., "DLA-Net: Learning dual local attention features for semantic segmentation of large-scale building facade point clouds," Pattern Recognit. 123: 108372, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 35] [SCOPUS Times Cited 39]


[8] J. Hou, A. Dai, M. Niesner, "3D-SIS: 3D semantic instance segmentation of RGB-D scans," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2019, pp. 4421-4430,
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 275] [SCOPUS Times Cited 357]


[9] L. Yi, W. Zhao, H. Wang, M. Sung, L. Guibas, "GSPN: Generative shape proposal network for 3D instance segmentation in point cloud," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019, pp. 3942-3951.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 193] [SCOPUS Times Cited 243]


[10] B. Yang, J. Wang, R. Clark, Q. Hu, S. Wang, A. Markham, "Learning object bounding boxes for 3D instance segmentation on point clouds," Advances in neural information processing systems, 2019, 32.
[CrossRef]


[11] F. Zhang, C. Guan, J. Fang, S. Bai, R. Yang, P. Torr, V. Prisacariu, "Instance segmentation of Lidar point clouds," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2020, pp.9448-9455.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 34] [SCOPUS Times Cited 51]


[12] W. Wang, R. Yu, Q. Huang, U. Neumann, "SGPN: Similarity group proposal network for 3D point cloud instance segmentation," Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2020, pp.2569-2578.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 389] [SCOPUS Times Cited 459]


[13] C. R. Qi, H. Su, K. Mo, L. J. Guibas, "Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation," Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017, pp.77-85.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3355] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10423]


[14] C. Liu, Y. Furukawa, "Masc: Multi-scale affinity with sparse convolution for 3D instance segmentation," arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04478, 2019.

[15] B. Graham, M. Engelcke, L. Van Der Maaten, "3D semantic segmentation with submanifold sparse convolutional networks," Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2018, pp.9224-9232.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1069] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1268]


[16] Z. Liang, M. Yang, H. Li, C. Wang, "3D instance embedding learning with a structure-aware loss function for point cloud segmentation," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. vol.5, no.3, pp.4915-4922, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 24] [SCOPUS Times Cited 32]


[17] D. Comaniciu, P. Meer, "Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.24, no.5, pp.603-619, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 7661] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10201]


[18] L. Jiang, H. Zhao, S. Shi, S. Liu, C. W. Fu, J. Jia, "Pointgroup: Dual-set point grouping for 3D instance segmentation," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020, pp. 4866-4875.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 279] [SCOPUS Times Cited 310]


[19] T. He, C. Shen, A. Hengel. "Dynamic Convolution for 3D point cloud instance segmentation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08392, 2021.
[CrossRef]


[20] Y. Guo, H. Wang, Q. Hu, H. Liu, L. Liu, M. Bennamoun, "Deep learning for 3D point clouds: A survey," IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 4338-4364, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1220] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1220]


[21] Q. H. Pham, T. Nguyen, B. S. Hua, G. Roig, S. K. Yeung, "JSIS3D: Joint semantic-instance segmentation of 3D point clouds with multi-task pointwise networks and multi-value conditional random fields," Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019, pp.8827-8836.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 147] [SCOPUS Times Cited 185]


[22] L. Zhao, W. Tao, "JSNet: Joint instance and semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds," Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 12951-12958, 2020.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 97]


[23] G. Wu, Z. Pan, P. Jiang, C. Tu, "Bi-Directional attention for joint instance and semantic segmentation in point clouds," Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2020, pp. 1-17.
[CrossRef]


[24] F. Chen, F. Wu, G. Gao, Y. Ji, J. Xu, G. Jiang, X. Jing, "JSPNet: Learning joint semantic & instance segmentation of point clouds via feature self-similarity and cross-task probability," Pattern Recognit. vol. 122, no. 108250, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 23] [SCOPUS Times Cited 24]


[25] C. Chen, L. Z. Fragonara, A. Tsourdos, "GAPNet: Graph attention based point neural network for exploiting local feature of point cloud," arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08705, 2019.
[CrossRef]


[26] Q. Hu, B. Yang, L. Xie, S. Rosa, Y. Guo, Z. Wang, N. Trigoni, A. Markham, "RandLA-Net: efficient semantic segmentation of large-scale point clouds," Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 11105-11114.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 573] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1389]


[27] I. Armeni, O. Sener, A. R. Zamir, H. Jiang, I. Brilakis, M. Fischer, S. Savarese, "3D semantic parsing of large-scale indoor spaces," Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016, pp. 1534-1543.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 870] [SCOPUS Times Cited 1474]


[28] A. Dai, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, M. Halber, T. Funkhouser, M. Nießner, "ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D reconstructions of indoor scenes," Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017, pp. 2432-2443.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2258] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2300]


[29] L. Du, J. Tan, X. Xue, L. Chen, "3DCFS: Fast and robust joint 3D semantic-instance segmentation via coupled feature selection," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2020, pp. 6868-6875.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 13]


[30] M. Zhong, G. Zeng, "Joint Semantic-Instance Segmentation of 3D point clouds: Instance separation and semantic fusion," 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2021, pp. 6616-6623.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 1] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 18,987 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 30,786 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 612 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 993 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2025-02-06 14:38 in 197 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2025
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: