Click to open the HelpDesk interface
AECE - Front page banner

Menu:


FACTS & FIGURES

JCR Impact Factor: 0.800
JCR 5-Year IF: 1.000
SCOPUS CiteScore: 2.0
Issues per year: 4
Current issue: Nov 2023
Next issue: Feb 2024
Avg review time: 77 days
Avg accept to publ: 48 days
APC: 300 EUR


PUBLISHER

Stefan cel Mare
University of Suceava
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science
13, Universitatii Street
Suceava - 720229
ROMANIA

Print ISSN: 1582-7445
Online ISSN: 1844-7600
WorldCat: 643243560
doi: 10.4316/AECE


TRAFFIC STATS

2,448,670 unique visits
979,606 downloads
Since November 1, 2009



Robots online now
Googlebot
ZoominfoBot
bingbot


SCOPUS CiteScore

SCOPUS CiteScore


SJR SCImago RANK

SCImago Journal & Country Rank




TEXT LINKS

Anycast DNS Hosting
MOST RECENT ISSUES

 Volume 23 (2023)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2023
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2023
 
 
 Volume 22 (2022)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2022
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2022
 
 
 Volume 21 (2021)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2021
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2021
 
 
 Volume 20 (2020)
 
     »   Issue 4 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 3 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 2 / 2020
 
     »   Issue 1 / 2020
 
 
  View all issues  


FEATURED ARTICLE

Analysis of the Hybrid PSO-InC MPPT for Different Partial Shading Conditions, LEOPOLDINO, A. L. M., FREITAS, C. M., MONTEIRO, L. F. C.
Issue 2/2022

AbstractPlus






LATEST NEWS

2023-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2022. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.800 (0.700 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 1.000.

2023-Jun-05
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2022, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2019-2022 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2022 is 2.0. For "General Computer Science" we rank #134/233 and for "Electrical and Electronic Engineering" we rank #478/738.

2022-Jun-28
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2021. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 0.825 (0.722 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.752.

2022-Jun-16
SCOPUS published the CiteScore for 2021, computed by using an improved methodology, counting the citations received in 2018-2021 and dividing the sum by the number of papers published in the same time frame. The CiteScore of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering for 2021 is 2.5, the same as for 2020 but better than all our previous results.

2021-Jun-30
Clarivate Analytics published the InCites Journal Citations Report for 2020. The InCites JCR Impact Factor of Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is 1.221 (1.053 without Journal self-cites), and the InCites JCR 5-Year Impact Factor is 0.961.

Read More »


    
 

  1/2023 - 1
View TOC | « Previous Article | Next Article »

HTBT: A Hybrid DASH Adaptation Algorithm Using Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Fuzzy Model

BANOVIC, R. See more information about BANOVIC, R. on SCOPUS See more information about BANOVIC, R. on IEEExplore See more information about BANOVIC, R. on Web of Science, KUKOLJ, D. See more information about  KUKOLJ, D. on SCOPUS See more information about  KUKOLJ, D. on SCOPUS See more information about KUKOLJ, D. on Web of Science, BASICEVIC, I. V. See more information about BASICEVIC, I. V. on SCOPUS See more information about BASICEVIC, I. V. on SCOPUS See more information about BASICEVIC, I. V. on Web of Science
 
View the paper record and citations in View the paper record and citations in Google Scholar
Click to see author's profile in See more information about the author on SCOPUS SCOPUS, See more information about the author on IEEE Xplore IEEE Xplore, See more information about the author on Web of Science Web of Science

Download PDF pdficon (1,704 KB) | Citation | Downloads: 35 | Views: 1,182

Author keywords
adaptive algorithms, fuzzy logic, multimedia communication, quality of service, streaming media

References keywords
streaming(18), adaptive(18), adaptation(14), video(12), rate(8), fuzzy(8), systems(7), networks(7), dash(7), quality(6)
Blue keywords are present in both the references section and the paper title.

About this article
Date of Publication: 2023-02-28
Volume 23, Issue 1, Year 2023, On page(s): 3 - 10
ISSN: 1582-7445, e-ISSN: 1844-7600
Digital Object Identifier: 10.4316/AECE.2023.01001
Web of Science Accession Number: 000937345700001
SCOPUS ID: 85150232251

Abstract
Quick view
Full text preview
Video streaming takes the largest share of internet traffic today, and MPEG dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) has become dominant among other video streaming standards and protocols. According to the DASH standard, multimedia content is encoded in different quality levels with different bitrates located on the server, and users can request multimedia content of any available bitrate. The user side determines the desired bitrate in the unit called adaptation bitrate (ABR) logic. Many ABR algorithms have been proposed to improve the quality of experience (QoE). The main criteria for determining QoE are average bitrate, number of switches between resolutions, and number of buffer underflows. This paper presents a hybrid DASH adaptation algorithm that uses the following input values: current buffer occupancy level, network throughput value calculated on the last downloaded DASH segment, and Takagi-Sugeno-Kang model output that represents expected throughput in the next segment download iteration. We compared the proposed algorithm with several other algorithms and the results show that it outperforms others in average bitrate and number of bitrate switches. Furthermore, our algorithm prevented all buffer underflows.


References | Cited By  «-- Click to see who has cited this paper

[1] I. Cisco, "Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and metodology, 2017-2022," CISCO White paper, 2017

[2] T. Stockhammer, "Dynamic adaptive streaming over http--: standards and design principles," in Proc. Second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems, 2011, pp. 133-144.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 960]


[3] I. Ayad, Y. Im, E. Keller, S. Ha, "A practical evaluation of rate adaptation algorithms in HTTP-based adaptive streaming," Computer Networks, vol. 133, pp. 90-103, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 22] [SCOPUS Times Cited 25]


[4] V. Vasilev, J. Leguay, S. Paris, L. Maggi and M. Debbah, "Predicting QoE Factors with Machine Learning," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018, pp. 1-6.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 35]


[5] A. Balachandran, V. Sekar, A. Akella, S. Seshan, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang, "A quest for an internet video quality-of-experience metric," in Proc. 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2012, pp. 97-102.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 86]


[6] J. D. Vriendt, D. D. Vleeschauwer, and D. C. Robinson, "QoE model for video delivered over an LTE network using HTTP adaptive streaming," Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 45-62, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 22]


[7] C. Alberti et al., "Automated QoE evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP," in Proc. 2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2013, pp. 58-63.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 57]


[8] A. C. Begen, M. N. Akcay, A. Bentaleb and A. Giladi, "Adaptive streaming of content-aware-encoded videos in dash.js," SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 30-38, May 2022.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 5]


[9] M. Batalla, "Advanced multimedia service provisioning based on efficient interoperability of adaptive streaming protocol and high efficient video coding," Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, vol. 12, pp. 443-454, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 19] [SCOPUS Times Cited 20]


[10] M. Azumi, T. Kurosaka and M. Bandai, "A QoE-Aware quality-level switching algorithm for adaptive video streaming," in Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2015, pp. 1-5.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13]


[11] C. Liu, I. Bouazizi, M. Gabbouj, "Rate adaptation for adaptive HTTP streaming," in Proc. MMSys '11, 2011, pp. 169-174.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 386]


[12] W. Huang, Y. Zhou, X. Xie, D. Wu, M. Chen and E. Ngai, "Buffer state is enough: Simplifying the design of QoE-Aware HTTP adaptive video streaming," IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 590-601, June 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 47] [SCOPUS Times Cited 53]


[13] T.-Y. Huang, R. Johari and N. McKeown, "Downton abbey without the hiccups: Buffer-based rate adaptation for http video streaming," in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future Human-centric Multimedia Networking, 2013, pp. 9-14.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 94]


[14] K. Spiteri, R. Urgaonkar and R. K. Sitaraman, "BOLA: Near-optimal bitrate adaptation for online videos," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1698-1711, Aug. 2020.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 87] [SCOPUS Times Cited 139]


[15] P. Wisniewski, J. Mongay Batalla, A. Beben, P. Krawiec, and A. Chydzinski, "On optimizing adaptive algorithms based on rebuffering probability," ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, vol. 13, no. 3s, pp. 1-20, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[16] X. Yin, A. Jindal, V. Sekar, B. Sinopoli, "A control-theoretic approach for dynamic adaptive video streaming over HTTP," in Proc. SIGCOMM '15, 2015, pp. 325-338.
[CrossRef]


[17] Y. Cao, X. You, J. Wang and L. Song, "A QoE friendly rate adaptation method for DASH," in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, 2014, pp. 1-6.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 18]


[18] S. -H. Chang, K. -J. Wang and J. -M. Ho, "Optimal DASH video scheduling over variable-bit-rate networks," in Proc. 9th International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Programming (PAAP), 2018, pp. 41-48.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[19] W. Rahman, M. D. Hossain, E.-N. Huh, "Fuzzy-based quality adaptation algorithm for improving QoE from MPEG-DASH video," Applied Sciences, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 2] [SCOPUS Times Cited 3]


[20] D. J. Vergados, A. Michalas, A. Sgora, D. D. Vergados and P. Chatzimisios, "FDASH: A Fuzzy-based MPEG/DASH adaptation algorithm," IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 859-868, June 2016.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 47] [SCOPUS Times Cited 55]


[21] J. Aguilar-Armijo, C. Timmerer and H. Hellwagner, "EADAS: Edge assisted adaptation scheme for HTTP adaptive streaming," in Proc. IEEE 46th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2021, pp. 487-494.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Record] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6]


[22] M. Kim and K. Chung, "Edge computing assisted adaptive streaming scheme for mobile networks," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 2142-2152, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 7] [SCOPUS Times Cited 11]


[23] J. Luo, F. R. Yu, Q. Chen and L. Tang, "Adaptive video streaming with edge caching and video transcoding over software-defined mobile networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1577-1592, March 2020.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 51] [SCOPUS Times Cited 63]


[24] J. O. Fajardo, I. Taboada and F. Liberal, "Improving content delivery efficiency through multi-layer mobile edge adaptation," IEEE Network, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 40-46, Nov.-Dec. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 38] [SCOPUS Times Cited 42]


[25] A. R. Bhat and S. K. Bhadu, "Machine learning based rate adaptation in DASH to improve quality of experience," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM), 2017, pp. 82-89.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 4]


[26] J. Liu, X. Tao and J. Lu, "QoE-oriented rate adaptation for dash with enhanced deep Q-Learning," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 8454-8469, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 17] [SCOPUS Times Cited 27]


[27] T. Abar, A. Ben Letaifa and S. Elasmi, "Enhancing QoE based on machine learning and DASH in SDN networks," in Proc. 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2018, pp. 258-263.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 9] [SCOPUS Times Cited 13]


[28] S. Nemet, D. Kukolj, G. Ostojic, S. Stankovski, and D. Jovanovic, "Aggregation framework for TSK fuzzy and association rules: interpretability improvement on a traffic accidents case," Applied Intelligence, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3909-3922, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 10] [SCOPUS Times Cited 14]


[29] I. Basicevic, D. Kukolj, M. Popovic, "On the application of fuzzy-based flow control approach to High Altitude Platform communications," Applied Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1-12, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 6] [SCOPUS Times Cited 6]


[30] M. Petkovic, I. Basicevic, D. Kukolj, et al., "Evaluation of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy method in entropy-based detection of DDoS attacks," Computer Science Informaation System, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 139-162, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 8] [SCOPUS Times Cited 10]


[31] T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, "Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-15, no. 1, pp. 116-132, Jan.-Feb. 1985.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 13536] [SCOPUS Times Cited 17005]


[32] D. Kukolj and E. Levi, "Identification of complex systems based on neural and Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 272-282, Feb. 2004.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 117] [SCOPUS Times Cited 152]


[33] D. Kukolj, "Design of adaptive Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy models", Applied Soft Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 89-103, 2002.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 108]


[34] K. Miller, E. Quacchio, G. Gennari, and A. Wolisz, "Adaptation algorithm for adaptive streaming over HTTP," in Proc. 19th Int. IEEE PV Workshop, 2012, pp. 173-178.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 203]


[35] C. Liu, I. Bouazizi, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj, "Rate adaptation for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP in content distributionnetwork," Signal Processing, Image Communication, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 288-311, Apr. 2012.
[CrossRef] [Web of Science Times Cited 58] [SCOPUS Times Cited 76]


[36] G. Tian and Y. Liu, "Towards agile and smooth video adaptation indynamic HTTP streaming," in Proc. 8th Int. CoNEXT, 2012, pp. 109-120.
[CrossRef] [SCOPUS Times Cited 236]


[37] [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[38] [Online] Available: Temporary on-line reference link removed - see the PDF document

[39] M. Kim and K. Chung, "Adaptive quality control scheme based on VBR characteristics to improve QoE of UHD streaming service," Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 89-98, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Full Text] [Web of Science Times Cited 3] [SCOPUS Times Cited 2]




References Weight

Web of Science® Citations for all references: 14,119 TCR
SCOPUS® Citations for all references: 19,942 TCR

Web of Science® Average Citations per reference: 353 ACR
SCOPUS® Average Citations per reference: 499 ACR

TCR = Total Citations for References / ACR = Average Citations per Reference

We introduced in 2010 - for the first time in scientific publishing, the term "References Weight", as a quantitative indication of the quality ... Read more

Citations for references updated on 2024-02-21 13:36 in 213 seconds.




Note1: Web of Science® is a registered trademark of Clarivate Analytics.
Note2: SCOPUS® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Disclaimer: All queries to the respective databases were made by using the DOI record of every reference (where available). Due to technical problems beyond our control, the information is not always accurate. Please use the CrossRef link to visit the respective publisher site.

Copyright ©2001-2024
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania


All rights reserved: Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering is a registered trademark of the Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied, recorded or archived, without the written permission from the Editor. When authors submit their papers for publication, they agree that the copyright for their article be transferred to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, if and only if the articles are accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints and translations.

Permission for other use: The copyright owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale. Specific written permission must be obtained from the Editor for such copying. Direct linking to files hosted on this website is strictly prohibited.

Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that all information and opinions formulated in the articles, as well as linguistic accuracy, are the sole responsibility of the author.




Website loading speed and performance optimization powered by: 


DNS Made Easy